Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

PLEASE help get this page removed

676 replies

supadupapupascupa · 23/02/2014 20:32

www.facebook.com/pages/Sexy-Little-Girls/668294383191172
I've been asked to share and ask others to report the page and it really is awful. Facebook are refusing to take it down because it contains no nudity...what do we do?????

OP posts:
AgaPanthers · 24/02/2014 15:32

I am an IT expert. And it's not true.

There are specific attacks you can make against Facebook accounts, but you aren't guaranteed to succeed.

And the work computer example means that your passwords, etc. are potentially logged on your work's server. That doesn't grant those details to a random hacker.

Koothrapanties · 24/02/2014 15:38
Mignonette · 24/02/2014 15:41

You aren't as much of an expert as my friend then. Because I have seen her do it love.

And the workplace comment was about accessing data left on the system by other people, not her.

Mignonette · 24/02/2014 15:43

And i will add finally that the people who insist it cannot be done are often those people who have designed the systems and hate the fact that it proves as leaky as an arse shot full of buckshot.

Gibbous · 24/02/2014 15:45

Newsflash! 'The main target of tonight’s campaign by Anonymous seems to be the Sexy Little Girls page'

(Unforch on my laptop the page has a banner advert for sexy Asian women, not the same but yanno.)

AgaPanthers · 24/02/2014 15:49

I have no idea what you saw, and I'm not about to take your word for it, because I've seen people convinced that things are 'hacks' just because they don't understand what is going on (e.g., Facebook apps granted permission, weak security settings, etc.).

If this 'Sexy Little Girls' page was previously private, then it could have been made public by a number of means, e.g., a phishing attack on the moderator, password reuse from another site, the attacker joining the group by sharing images, eventually being granted moderator rights as a trusted user, and then making it public.

If you look at undercover websites, things like 'The Silk Road', which was a billion dollar secret drug website, it was very easy to get a trusted position in that website simply by being nice and doing favours for the administrator.

When it comes to a Facebook group of this nature things aren't any different, people can be fooled, this guy: medium.com/p/24eb09e026dd lost his twitter account not because of a specific Twitter vulnerability, but multiple social engineering attacks on other websites.

But that's not the same thing as Twitter, or Facebook, being just instantly hackable.

Mignonette · 24/02/2014 15:54

Aga

It's kind of hard to take what you say seriously when you first of all very patronisingly tell me I didn't see what I saw nor understood what I saw and had explained to me.

Secondly it is hard to take what you say seriously when you deny the existence of something i have seen to exist and happen in front of my eyes.

ReadyToPopAndFresh · 24/02/2014 16:01

Oh but you should definitely believe Aga is an "expert" mig. Because they said they were. Hmm

AgaPanthers · 24/02/2014 16:04

But you haven't actually given a meaningful description of what you saw happen. 'Hack' could describe a dozen different things. And so could 'FB page'.

I 'hacked' an unowned Facebook page, by claiming ownership of it to Facebook using a domain + email of the same name.

My ability to do that doesn't mean I can go onto Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook and delete all his friends.

There is not a universal Facebook hack, but plenty of ways to 'hack' it. That doesn't mean that your personal Facebook account cane be 'hacked'.

MamaMary · 24/02/2014 16:04

Gosh, Gibbous, the 'Facebook Paedophiles' Shock

Facebook should be ashamed of itself. It needs to buck up its ideas big-time.

And yes, this is an issue that affects us all and a perfectly legitimate thread. Hmm

Mandy2003 · 24/02/2014 16:10

This could be the kind of thing that will eventually kill Facebook rubs hands with glee

Sorry, I am a longtime FB refusenik.

FiveExclamations · 24/02/2014 16:12

George at Asda just tweeted me asking for more information.

youarewinning · 24/02/2014 16:12

Aga somewhere somehow people get these links up without intention or searching them. They open them, realise they are inappropriate and report. I've ended up seeing some very dodgy stuff before when searching innocent things in google. One link on your browser does not prove or disprove intention. That is why prosecuting bodies look at internet history as a whole.

If they didn't I'd imagine most of the UK would be locked up or have a criminal record.

BelleateSebastian · 24/02/2014 16:18

With respect Mignonette, Aga does seem to know what s/he is talking about and has made some valid points

"You aren't as much of an expert as my friend then. Because I have seen her do it love." This sentence sounds like something my 12year old would say! lol

youarewinning · 24/02/2014 16:23

TBf belle mig response you quoted above was to Aga telling her her friend didn't hack. You can't say because Aga is using more technical terms than Mig that she has more knowledge. mig has stately clearly it was demonstrated to her.

MrsFruitcake · 24/02/2014 16:47

I clicked the link. Glad it's been taken down now.

sweetassugarhardasnails · 24/02/2014 17:24

I've received this message from facebook

^"You reported Rodney Hopkins's timeline for posting inappropriate content.

Status This timeline was removed

We reviewed the timeline you reported for posting inappropriate content. Since it violated our Community Standards, we removed it. Thanks for your report. We let Rodney Hopkins know that their timeline has been removed, but not who reported it. Facebook never discloses who submits a report."^

I wonder if it was definitely him that set up the page his removal has meant the page went to.....

Cocolepew · 24/02/2014 17:32

If people can sit in their bedrooms and 'hack'into NASA, the White House and such why is it so hard to believe someone with a bit of kknowledge can 'hack' into FB or banking Confused.

AgaPanthers · 24/02/2014 17:56

There are hundreds of thousands of NASA computers, the ones hacked e.g. by Gary McKinnon had blank passwords. That's trivial stuff.

By contrast Facebook is a single public facing website. Not one of millions of government PCs and information systems, and there will be hundreds of staff focused on its security, including some very capable people.

And as a public facing website, the most-used in the world, if there was a single credible report or evidence of Facebook being generally vulnerable to someone on the level a friend of a mouthy Mumsnet poster, then that would be huge news for a company worth $200 billion.

It's just not true.

Cocolepew · 24/02/2014 18:01

Cheeky.

Crazedpinkstarfish · 24/02/2014 18:15

Hmm the only person coming across as mouthy is you Aga

Thoroughly sickened by how this has turned into a showdown between 2 posters, lots of posters did good work over the last couple of days and that's totally been overshadowed.

SabrinaMulhollandJjones · 24/02/2014 18:19

AgaPanthers Mon 24-Feb-14 13:37:37
This thread is a fucking car crash.

It wasn't, Aga. But you've made it into one now.

Methe · 24/02/2014 18:22

I couldn't give a fuck if you pair are Bill Gates and Steve Jobs reincarnated.

This thread isnt about you.

Stfu.

Koothrapanties · 24/02/2014 18:26

Well this thread took an odd turn!

ChestyNut · 24/02/2014 18:28

Awesome work everyone Thanks

Not sure what agas problem is Hmm