MOsschops: the evidence for W&R being a man was that there were remarkable -'convergences' between the person W&R claimed to be and a man claiming to be a psychologist who also posted oin some local 'old friends and neighbours' sites. V complicayted - basically W&R may have actually been the man claiming to be her husband! ALSO, far less refutable, when discussing a meet-up point, s/he described a place in a shopping centre in terms of 'just past Carphone Warehouse, opposite Footlocker and not as far as Halfords' - and someone, maybe JanH, pointed out that a woman would have referenced directions between Next, Monsoon and Toni&Guy.