Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Non-member requests

This topic is for non-members looking for MN users' input; there is a £30 fee.

Do British mums care about ageing and what do they do?

110 replies

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 13:13

Hello mums! ’m building a nutrition brand specifically for women over 40 because honestly, so much of the wellness industry still feels either aimed at 20 year olds or just men.

A lot of women I speak to say they’re noticing changes in energy, strength, recovery, muscle tone, weight distribution and just generally not feeling quite like themselves anymore, even when they’re exercising and eating well.

We’re trying to understand what women actually want from products in this space before we launch anything, so we’ve put together a short survey (takes about 5 minutes).

Would hugely appreciate anyone filling it out or sharing with friends/relatives in this age group.

There’s also a chance to win a £100 Amazon voucher as a thank you.

Survey link: https://form.typeform.com/to/s1mXw0Wf

QR:

Thank you so much, genuinely grateful for any help or opinions.

Do British mums care about ageing and what do they do?
OP posts:
Millindugu · 17/05/2026 19:47

can only ever draw if you share with 5 other people 🙄

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:47

ValenciaOrange · 17/05/2026 19:41

Filled out your survey but can't submit without giving you my email.address so have abandoned it.

That's not a problem, thank you so much for taking the time!

OP posts:
rubyslippers · 17/05/2026 19:47

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:45

I do understand what you mean and I’m sorry that’s how it feels, because I can absolutely see why women in this age group are exhausted by being constantly sold to. I think marketing is one thing, but another thing that genuinely surprised me when I started reading more deeply into this area was how under-researched women still seem to be generally compared to men, especially around ageing, strength, recovery, nutrition etc.
That’s actually a big part of why this became important to me in the first place. Not because I think women over 40 need another lousy brand telling them to “embrace the journey”, but because there seems to be a lot of noise and not always enough genuinely useful evidence-based support.

You’re surprised that women’s health and wellbeing is ignored and under researched?!
are you for real (or a man)

seriously

LizTruss · 17/05/2026 19:49

No, 'British Mums' couldn't give a Tinkers Cuss about aging. In fact, I would go as far to say that, they look forward to it.

Batties · 17/05/2026 19:49

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:37

I genuinely wasn’t trying to mansplain - If anything, the reason I’m interested in this space is because women in my life have struggled and I’ve seen how confusing/noisy the whole landscape feels. What I’m actually trying to understand from threads like this is: in the middle of all the wellness marketing, supplements, influencers, HRT conversations, conflicting advice etc. who do women actually trust anymore? And what support feels genuinely useful versus exhausting or patronising.

Confusing? How patronising.

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/05/2026 19:50

Are you entering the protein powder market?

Bettermuseli · 17/05/2026 19:50

So much of this stuff out there already, and so much marketing trying to convince women that they should not look their age. No more please.

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/05/2026 19:51

Note that OP has had a thread hidden for MNHQ to look at.

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:51

rubyslippers · 17/05/2026 19:47

You’re surprised that women’s health and wellbeing is ignored and under researched?!
are you for real (or a man)

seriously

No, I'm a woman and I know VERY well that historically it has been under-researched (because women were considered too 'volatile', which is nuts). What surprised me more was how many women in this thread feel simultaneously over-marketed to despite the clear lack of clinically-backed support.

OP posts:
Bettermuseli · 17/05/2026 19:52

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:51

No, I'm a woman and I know VERY well that historically it has been under-researched (because women were considered too 'volatile', which is nuts). What surprised me more was how many women in this thread feel simultaneously over-marketed to despite the clear lack of clinically-backed support.

Marketing and clinically backed support are very different things.

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/05/2026 19:53

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:51

No, I'm a woman and I know VERY well that historically it has been under-researched (because women were considered too 'volatile', which is nuts). What surprised me more was how many women in this thread feel simultaneously over-marketed to despite the clear lack of clinically-backed support.

There are sound reasons for not doing clinical trials and other medical research on women of child-bearing age.

Spicysirracha · 17/05/2026 19:53

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:51

No, I'm a woman and I know VERY well that historically it has been under-researched (because women were considered too 'volatile', which is nuts). What surprised me more was how many women in this thread feel simultaneously over-marketed to despite the clear lack of clinically-backed support.

You don’t seem to have walked in to a Boots, Superdrug or holland and Barratt in the last five years
you don’t seem to have picked up a magazine in the last 10 years
or a weekend supplement

you don’t seem to be on an SM

odd

Batties · 17/05/2026 19:53

Did you ask MN if you could post this?

EmpressaurusKitty · 17/05/2026 19:53

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/05/2026 19:51

Note that OP has had a thread hidden for MNHQ to look at.

To be fair, that was because the OP previously started this thread on a different board & got reported for advertising, so this is the paid for version.

Spicysirracha · 17/05/2026 19:54

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/05/2026 19:51

Note that OP has had a thread hidden for MNHQ to look at.

Yes clocked that

It is very sketchy

but ultimately…. It’s all rather backfired on the op

rubyslippers · 17/05/2026 19:54

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:51

No, I'm a woman and I know VERY well that historically it has been under-researched (because women were considered too 'volatile', which is nuts). What surprised me more was how many women in this thread feel simultaneously over-marketed to despite the clear lack of clinically-backed support.

you said, and I quote: “and I another thing that genuinely surprised me when I started reading more deeply into this area was how under-researched women still seem to be generally compared to men, especially around ageing, strength, recovery, nutrition etc”

you are not communicating well then because you sound surprised above but then say but I knew that …

Batties · 17/05/2026 19:55

EmpressaurusKitty · 17/05/2026 19:53

To be fair, that was because the OP previously started this thread on a different board & got reported for advertising, so this is the paid for version.

Is this one paid for or has he been able to just post without permission.

Spicysirracha · 17/05/2026 19:55

Batties · 17/05/2026 19:55

Is this one paid for or has he been able to just post without permission.

And where does it even say paid for?

1in3willgetcancer · 17/05/2026 19:56

Batties · 17/05/2026 19:49

Confusing? How patronising.

It’s ok, the OP is here to explain it to us poor old biddies.

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/05/2026 19:56

EmpressaurusKitty · 17/05/2026 19:53

To be fair, that was because the OP previously started this thread on a different board & got reported for advertising, so this is the paid for version.

Ah OK.
OP should have saved her £ or spent it on supplements

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:56

EmpressaurusKitty · 17/05/2026 19:53

To be fair, that was because the OP previously started this thread on a different board & got reported for advertising, so this is the paid for version.

That's correct - I wasn't aware that there was a separate thread just for these types of posts and HQ kindly explained that this is where I can post it for the paid version, which I did. The content was very much the same, and the goal stays the same.

OP posts:
Batties · 17/05/2026 19:58

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:56

That's correct - I wasn't aware that there was a separate thread just for these types of posts and HQ kindly explained that this is where I can post it for the paid version, which I did. The content was very much the same, and the goal stays the same.

Have you paid then?

WellyBellyBoo · 17/05/2026 19:58

Absolutely not. There is far to much fake science and marketing already. If you were suggesting a real solution like funding for clinical trials and health research on women or a book/podcast exploring proper, peer reviewed science I'd be interested. And if anyone tells me to eat more protein again I'll eat my own right arm.

rubyslippers · 17/05/2026 19:59

WellyBellyBoo · 17/05/2026 19:58

Absolutely not. There is far to much fake science and marketing already. If you were suggesting a real solution like funding for clinical trials and health research on women or a book/podcast exploring proper, peer reviewed science I'd be interested. And if anyone tells me to eat more protein again I'll eat my own right arm.

Edited

That would be full of protein tho

Busybeeontwofeet · 17/05/2026 19:59

Batties · 17/05/2026 19:58

Have you paid then?

I did, like everyone else posting in this group - sorry if that wasn't clear!

OP posts: