Permitting an organisation named Generation Rent to take part in forming government policy is Age Discrimination.
One inherent assumption is that a certain age cohort, covering twenty-ish years, are the only people who could need to rent.
Seek facts before setting parameters for meaningful 'research': Reaching the age of 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100 does not magically make anyone a secure-for-life council tenant, nor magically make them home-owners.
A second thing taken for granted is that no man would try to have sex with any woman outside that 20-30s age band. (!)
Seek facts (available in Independent Age and Rowntree research, among others). Corpses are not invulnerable, every helpless person from one year old to a hundred and one is vulnerable.Incarcerated people, unconscious people, mute people, disabled people, hospital patients and of course women of every age are liable to be propositioned, or, if particularly vulnerable, to be simply raped. (A chinese olympics official had boasted online about the amusement he found as a boy, raping, beating, humiliating and torturing a disabled, mute, classmate)
So, no, the only people likely to be subjected to sexual approaches or assaults in trying to get a roof over their heads are not those age-prejudiced enough to define themselves as 'generation rent'
(Fact check, again, unpartnered 21-39's mainly live with chummies or mummies)
Our Government asking this curiously limited group to conduct their survey is akin to them asking an organisation called Irish in England:
Their information is not invalid, but nor is it the least representative of the whole picture of everyone's life in England.
There's another organisation taking government money to give the opinion of a -prejudiced lobby group- 'think tank': On many aspects of government policy a fee goes to the -Age Hate- 'Resolution' Foundation.
( 'Resolution' being a slightly less sinister name than 'Final Solution )