P.S. You may also know there is no such thing as domestic violence protection, if your rapist, batterer, financial coercer is 'merely' a fellow occupant or sub landlord. You have an 'incorrect' assailant, so you do not count and your life does not count and you may not go to a refuge or get any help at all from domestic violence schemes.
If you have never had an 'intimate relationship' you are deemed magically capable of skipping off and getting somewhere else to live, the moment someone does something you dislike. (Illogically, because who on earth would be living in insecure dangerous usually illegal HMOs if they had anywhere at all they could go instead?)
The woman MP who brought the house of commons to tears, telling of her coercive partner, was surrounded daily by fellow MPs who were barristers and would have given free legal advice, and she could have ordered one of her secretaries to nip out and view a flat to buy or rent at any moment, with certainty she would be given first option and certainty she could afford it. On MP pay and perks, she could have rented a suite at the Dorchester. She was not stuck nor trapped nor unable to escape. Yet her pals wept, agreeing of course someone like her should have priority access to whatever is going in the way of domestic violence protection, police priority, free legal aid, refuge places, and the publicly funded charities specialising in domestic abuse from 'correct' assailants, including coercive behaviour of any sort.
Yes of course coercive behaviour should be an offence, but there appears some disproportion in the extremes of who is included, and who is excluded. An elderly disabled woman can be forced to hand over money, can be raped, can be beaten, can have absolutely no escape. And she does not count.
So called 'generation rent' people should be ashamed of themselves for Age Discrimination which is a legal offence as well as morally reprehensible.