Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

£100k + Universal Credit?

278 replies

NeverGoingToGiveYouUpButIMayLetYouDown · 23/09/2025 15:44

I want to claim UC as I am no longer able to work due to a progressive illness.

Husband and I are divorcing. I owed him money, from a verbally-agreed loan between us both, so I transferred money to him three months ago. Plus, some of his savings were in my account, so I also transferred this back to him three months ago.

Will Universal Credit look unfavourably at all this - that I transferred £100k to him, and have very little (less than £16k) left over for myself? I have never claimed benefits before, so I am nervous this will be seen as deprivation of capital, despite occuring prior to me making a claim.

OP posts:
Clonakilla · 23/09/2025 22:40

How were you going to pay back the loan?

Anyway - just see a solicitor. When people share the raising of children - which involves both providing direct care and paying for them. - as you and your husband did, they typically split assets upon divorce to reflect that.

mysoulmio · 23/09/2025 22:41

And I don't believe that anyone would self fund a total of 100K for private cancer treatement in the UK as theres really no need. Or if this guy did for some reason, he's clearly loaded and the OP should be expecting a lot more than 850 a month and has no need for UC.

ToKittyornottoKitty · 23/09/2025 22:43

Arlanymor · 23/09/2025 22:37

It wasn’t at all and I have explained twice now - and now three times - why a course of radiotherapy - I literally said I worked in radiotherapy - wouldn’t cost that much private or otherwise. I never said she didn’t have cancer and never would. I worked in oncology for a decade. Think of me what you will. I was making the point that the OP is being taken for a complete ride by her soon to be ex. I think she has been financially abused by him. That was my point all along. I have also advised her that her legal advice is trash and wished her well.

You literally said ‘no cancer treatment’.

Change2banon · 23/09/2025 22:44

What a croc of shit 🙄🙄

Awwlookatmybabyspider · 23/09/2025 22:45

Surely a verbal agreement unless recorded can not be proven either way so I’d imagine the DWP will have a hard time buying it. However that’s just my theory, certainly doesn’t mean I’m correct.

bumbaloo · 23/09/2025 22:45

NeverGoingToGiveYouUpButIMayLetYouDown · 23/09/2025 17:17

I was seen for chemo (and still am!) at Mount Vernon so did not need the loan in the end. My husband had originally transferred a sum to my account for the purpose of alternative treatment at a BMI hospital. It is a loan because it is 'his' money - his words, not mine. FYI, the mealy-mouthed comment was his, not mine, and I hope I caused no offence.

We have a joint representation solicitor for the divorce. Because I was so unwell, my husband dealt with it. We are in the 20 week cool off period.

Why did you just do what he told you to do

Tartantotty · 23/09/2025 22:50

If you want a benefit and have a serious illness maybe disability benefit is best for you.

LJ125 · 23/09/2025 22:53

OP, please please please get your own legal representation in respect of your financial settlement with your husband. You urgently need independent advice. On the face of it the proposed settlement does not sound at all fair to you.

Naanspiration · 23/09/2025 23:02

NeverGoingToGiveYouUpButIMayLetYouDown · 23/09/2025 16:56

To add further, the loan was for medical treatment at a BMI hospital. He wanted this back.

Lies on top of lies

YetAnotherAlias62 · 23/09/2025 23:04

Sounds like you need a SHL (shit hot lawyer) for your divorce.....
In case the Mount Vernon hospital you mention is the one near me, I'll PM you the website for the lawyer I used for my divorce, I thought she was excellent and I now wish I'd taken all of her advice (I folded on some things in the end as I just wanted it to be over but I regret that now)
Good luck.

Naanspiration · 23/09/2025 23:05

Arlanymor · 23/09/2025 17:14

Do you usually speak like this? For someone so magniloquent (I know words too) you would think you would know this information without having to double check on a forum. Anyway, you have your answer - it's clear deprivation.

I think OP is using AI to make her sound more convincing

Angelou79 · 23/09/2025 23:13

Can I ask a conterversial question? Have you worked? Paid national insurance? Why do you assume you are eligible for uc?
No judgement but curious & amazed. Good luck

ToKittyornottoKitty · 23/09/2025 23:15

Angelou79 · 23/09/2025 23:13

Can I ask a conterversial question? Have you worked? Paid national insurance? Why do you assume you are eligible for uc?
No judgement but curious & amazed. Good luck

You can tell from the opening sentence that she has worked.

ExitPursuedByABare · 23/09/2025 23:17

@Naanspiration

I agree. Very odd use of language.

NeverGoingToGiveYouUpButIMayLetYouDown · 23/09/2025 23:24

3 months ago, my husband said 'You are to return every penny of mine in your accounts, including the XYZ I lent you for medical treatment'.

I am a hypochondriac, so when I got serious symptoms at the end of last year, it sent me into a spiral and thus, he agreed to lend me money. I now realise this wasn't as charitable as he made out. The money was untouched, unmoved and unused as I was seen on the NHS within a week.

What is so difficult to believe about that?

I am not a muppet as someone so unkindly put it. Both of us had these conversations about UC and the settlement infront of the joint rep solicitor who did not say a peep out of turn against my husband. Surely, the solicitor would have said funds in a marriage are shared - despite my belief that as he was earning it all, it belongs to him. In effect, he was temporarily dumping it in my account. Marriage allowance exists for tax advantages which we did previously.

In the case of money being shared, I should have access to half of his personal (multiple!) ISAs and savings, which was never ever brought up in our appointments by our joint solicitor. My husband is wealthy. I do not need UC if what was shared on here is correct - I may never need it if I have access to even one half of one of his pensions.

OP posts:
Starwarsepisode3 · 23/09/2025 23:26

NeverGoingToGiveYouUpButIMayLetYouDown · 23/09/2025 23:24

3 months ago, my husband said 'You are to return every penny of mine in your accounts, including the XYZ I lent you for medical treatment'.

I am a hypochondriac, so when I got serious symptoms at the end of last year, it sent me into a spiral and thus, he agreed to lend me money. I now realise this wasn't as charitable as he made out. The money was untouched, unmoved and unused as I was seen on the NHS within a week.

What is so difficult to believe about that?

I am not a muppet as someone so unkindly put it. Both of us had these conversations about UC and the settlement infront of the joint rep solicitor who did not say a peep out of turn against my husband. Surely, the solicitor would have said funds in a marriage are shared - despite my belief that as he was earning it all, it belongs to him. In effect, he was temporarily dumping it in my account. Marriage allowance exists for tax advantages which we did previously.

In the case of money being shared, I should have access to half of his personal (multiple!) ISAs and savings, which was never ever brought up in our appointments by our joint solicitor. My husband is wealthy. I do not need UC if what was shared on here is correct - I may never need it if I have access to even one half of one of his pensions.

Get your own solicitor. Please.

oviraptor21 · 23/09/2025 23:30

I'm glad you are getting your own solicitor.
Just to add, in case it hasn't already been mentioned, if your ex did pay you £850 a month ( hopefully this won't happen and you'll get a clean break agreement) this would be deducted £ for £ from UC.

ThistleTits · 23/09/2025 23:31

I'm looking at it as "dodgy" and I don't work for the dwp. Unless you can prove you owed the money and he had the savings in your bank, I think they won't look favourably.

ReadingSoManyThreads · 23/09/2025 23:41

You need to stop listening to what your DH is telling you. He's only looking out for himself. Do NOT tell him anything your new solicitor tells you. Keep your cards close to your chest, you cannot trust your DH. He's trying to screw you over.

HostaCentral · 23/09/2025 23:41

I wonder whether OP is Muslim and being divorced under Sharia law?? Weird assumption. Sorry if I'm way off the mark here .... But the comment on her not being aware that half of marital assets are hers in a divorce is odd if she isn't from a different culture??

AngelicKaty · 23/09/2025 23:49

NeverGoingToGiveYouUpButIMayLetYouDown · 23/09/2025 23:24

3 months ago, my husband said 'You are to return every penny of mine in your accounts, including the XYZ I lent you for medical treatment'.

I am a hypochondriac, so when I got serious symptoms at the end of last year, it sent me into a spiral and thus, he agreed to lend me money. I now realise this wasn't as charitable as he made out. The money was untouched, unmoved and unused as I was seen on the NHS within a week.

What is so difficult to believe about that?

I am not a muppet as someone so unkindly put it. Both of us had these conversations about UC and the settlement infront of the joint rep solicitor who did not say a peep out of turn against my husband. Surely, the solicitor would have said funds in a marriage are shared - despite my belief that as he was earning it all, it belongs to him. In effect, he was temporarily dumping it in my account. Marriage allowance exists for tax advantages which we did previously.

In the case of money being shared, I should have access to half of his personal (multiple!) ISAs and savings, which was never ever brought up in our appointments by our joint solicitor. My husband is wealthy. I do not need UC if what was shared on here is correct - I may never need it if I have access to even one half of one of his pensions.

OP, it is not ethical for the same lawyer to act for both parties to a divorce because of the inherent conflict of interest i.e. it would be impossible for the lawyer to give you both impartial advice. However, some firms offer a "one couple, one lawyer" or "Resolution Together" model where a single solicitor guides a divorcing couple through an amicable process, but this is only suitable if there is no conflict and requires full transparency and collaboration from both parties. Given your rather passive attitude to your divorce it seems your STBX has easily convinced this solicitor that this approach is suitable for your situation - and, of course, because you're agreeing to all your STBX's demands (including giving up your share of the house FFS!) it seems that it is. Unfortunately, you are about to be MASSIVELY MUGGED OFF BY YOUR STBX UNLESS YOU WISE UP! PLEASE tell this solicitor you didn't realise that this "Resolution Together" approach was being used for your divorce, that it is not appropriate and that you need to get your own solicitor - and then do so.
And why on earth do you think a solicitor would know anything about benefits like UC? It has nothing whatsoever to do with their job.

AnneShirleyBlythe · 23/09/2025 23:54

Your XH has really taken advantage of your illness here OP. When you were at your most vulnerable he manipulated you into a divorce settlement whiich is very much in his favour. Get a better lawyer & fight for your fair & lawful share. He may have earned it but who was looking after the DC & facilitating him earning the big bucks? Is the new partner an affair partner? Hes moved on fast. What a horrible man. Hope you find the strength to fight fie your money.

TheGreatWesternShrew · 24/09/2025 00:03

What did you think the point of a legal marriage was if not to pool your assets so everything was shared OP?

Get a new lawyer. Contact the old one to say you were misled about shared representation. Tell the Ex NOTHING until you have consulted a lawyer.

SalonDesRefuses · 24/09/2025 00:29

NeverGoingToGiveYouUpButIMayLetYouDown · 23/09/2025 23:24

3 months ago, my husband said 'You are to return every penny of mine in your accounts, including the XYZ I lent you for medical treatment'.

I am a hypochondriac, so when I got serious symptoms at the end of last year, it sent me into a spiral and thus, he agreed to lend me money. I now realise this wasn't as charitable as he made out. The money was untouched, unmoved and unused as I was seen on the NHS within a week.

What is so difficult to believe about that?

I am not a muppet as someone so unkindly put it. Both of us had these conversations about UC and the settlement infront of the joint rep solicitor who did not say a peep out of turn against my husband. Surely, the solicitor would have said funds in a marriage are shared - despite my belief that as he was earning it all, it belongs to him. In effect, he was temporarily dumping it in my account. Marriage allowance exists for tax advantages which we did previously.

In the case of money being shared, I should have access to half of his personal (multiple!) ISAs and savings, which was never ever brought up in our appointments by our joint solicitor. My husband is wealthy. I do not need UC if what was shared on here is correct - I may never need it if I have access to even one half of one of his pensions.

Oh my God, I genuinely feel awful for you. I'm so angry on your behalf.

Fuck your husband and this joint solicitor.

I am sooo glad you're getting your own solicitor - PLEASE definitely do this.

You say there was no abuse of any kind, well I'm sorry but this guy is absolutely a nasty piece of work, and was at the very least financially abusing you.

I can't believe what I've just read.

DO NOT LISTEN TO HIM.

SparklingRivers · 24/09/2025 00:45

You'll need to sort out getting half the assets in the divorce then ideally putting it on a house deposit before claiming UC. They won't help with your mortgage but you may still qualify for some other money depending on children/income.