Does RB mean "universal" when she says impersonal @Spongebobette? Who knows and it doesn't really matter in the end because the rest of her word salad is manipulative horse shit.
If someone wants to visualise achieving their ambitions and takes a realistic and flexible view about achieving them, builds a healthy philosophy about failure and adjustment of goals/moving to plan B AND takes active steps towards those goals then that is good but that's not what proponents of LoA are suggesting.
The whole LoA thing is like a mass gaslighting exercise where pragmatism, rational thinking and self-awareness are banned and labelled as "negative" and self-efficacy manipulated. Nurse now has the goals she thinks she should have because that's what her coach (and previously Yawn) has dictated her goals should be. She's so lost that she is reliant on a happy accident (like a good parking space) to convince herself she is on the right track. So much harm has flowed from this.
She can continue to gaslight herself about the daily ups and downs but what happens to people like Nurse who have marinaded themselves in this toxic positivity and magical thinking when a big negative comes along that is beyond their control and very difficult? I'm thinking of things like divorce, illness, bereavement. What happens if being positive is a completely irrational response? When a bad thing happens how does someone cope if they have isolated themselves from all but the similarly gaslit who, when the big negative thing happens, will distance themselves from "dangerous negativity". I've seen clients before who have really disturbed and isolated themselves this way.
Steve Hassan has a good summary of what we often say on these threads www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-of-mind/202302/why-the-law-of-attraction-is-problematic-and-dangerous#:~:text=A%20major%20concern%20with%20the,able%20to%20manifest%20their%20desires.