I agree @unoeufisunoeuf1.
There is a tendency towards misogyny in a lot of the "Karen" stuff that currently abounds online- sure, bad behaviour is being rightly held up for criticism and scorn, but it is telling there is no "Karl" (or whatever the name may have been).
Nonetheless, bad behaviour is exactly that, and deserves to be held to account.
MLMs prey on women, and the model tends to be wealthy male CEOs recruiting a bunch of ruthless 'senior' women who will get a share of the spoils if they can inveigle enough (mainly female) victims into the pyramid, and milk them for as long as possible.
As a result, most of the interactions and behaviours that are visible tend to involve women lying, dissembling, bullying etc.
This is the coal face of exposing these scams for what they are. The recruiters who perpetuate the scam are overwhelmingly women (as are their victims). It is in exposing their lies that an anti-MLM movement can hope to have the strongest effect (while regulatory authorities turn a blind eye).
So, in conclusion, it is inevitably the case that those in the firing line of a movement to prevent women falling victim to this predatory model will also mainly be women who are trying to draw them in. I don't feel that this is misogynistic- the MLM model and the mainly male owners of such schemes are guilty of harming women, as are the mainly women 'top bots' who knowingly draw (often vulnerable) women into a place where they will be exploited, lose money, lose friends, lose families, and sometimes lose their sanity or even their lives.
This thread has always been clear in the above, and at least as hard, if not more so (rightly in my opinion), on the minority of man bots, such as Sleaze, Broke, Saba PT, Messiah, who grace these posts.
MLMs are per se exploitative of women. To expose the women (and men) who are complicit in this exploitation is not misogynistic, it is speaking truth to power.