Fastdaytears and xenu1 - Again, it would be very easy for regulators to establish that this is just another absurd chapter of the 'MLM' fairy story, but why (when the withholding of key-information from people in order to take their money, is defined as fraud) has the truth always been hidden from the public and from regulators?
Here are just a few of the common-sense questions which regulators might one day get round to finding answers to in 'FLP's' accounts:
How many decendants of deceased 'FLP' adherents have received any 'residual payments?'
If decendants of deceased 'FLP' adherents have received 'residual payments,' how many persons have continued to receive them for more than one year, two years, three years, etc. ?
How many decendents of deceased 'FLP' adherents are currently receiving 'residual payments?'
Given that recipients of these 'residual payments' have all been obliged to fulfill certain regular financial obligations in order to continue to receive them, would these 'residual payments' (if they actually do exist) have represented a net-benefit?