OK, I'm on my own with two under-sixes, and currently live in a 3 bed, detached house in a fairly well-regarded residential area. I'm getting decent child-support from my ex husband (only my younger child is his), and I work full-time. However, it is a stretch, and I'm often just skint. I was thinking of trying to sell the house (albeit at a loss), and downsizing to a 2 bed, ex-authority house. I've got two boys, and would be happy with a smaller place as long as it had a small garden and was near their school. If I did this, I may (almost) be able to be mortgage free. There are very nice houses like this in areas of the town I live in, but I'm not sure if this is the right thing to do (financially or otherwise). I'm not a property snob, and was born and brought up in this type of housing - but people tell me it's a very backwards move, and not a good thing to do in terms of future 'investment', etc. So, is it better to live in a smaller house, in a less 'lush' area, but have more cash to do things such as go out, buy nice clothes, have a holiday - or is it better to hang onto the bigger house, 'nicer' residential area, and struggle for ready cash?