Wonder if people with a bit more experience could help with a dilemma my DP and I are having?
We live in a house converted into 2 flats and it's in fairly decent condition. We've recently had rooms plastered and the bathrooms are in decent nick - good tiling, bright and fresh etc.
The only jobs that really need doing are the floor in hallway and kitchen and the kitchen itself. The floor is easy to sort out and not a worry.
The kitchen, although serviceable is poorly laid out and a bit tatty. The cupboards are old (were already in place when flat was purchased 9 years ago) and the work surfaces are damaged in places; a bit dented, chips on the edge.
The DP thinks we should have a new kitchen but I think we should just give it a lick of paint to make it look fresher. We'd like to move in around 18 months so I don't think we'd get the benefit of the kitchen. It might make it easier to sell the flat but it's £3000 we could do better things with. DP disagrees and thinks it will add value to the sale price.
I know the kitchen is really important when people are looking at purchasing property but I feel it would be better for us to save the money and maybe take a hit on the sale price - let the new owner decide what sort of kitchen they want and how much they want to spend. OTOH, being a small flat, it will appeal to first time buyers who may not have budget for a new kitchen and would like to move in without doing any work.
WWYD?