The reason I'm asking about the cholesterol is two-fold @dogmandu
First, not all doctors and/or scientists believe that low cholesterol is the problem it's made out to be.
Here's a piece from Zoe Harcombe:
The cholesterol hypothesis originated in the early years of the twentieth century. While performing autopsies, Russian pathologists noticed build-up in the arteries of deceased people. The build-up contained cholesterol. They hypothesised that the cholesterol had caused the build-up and blocked the artery leading to a sudden death (the term “heart attacks” was not much used before the end of World War II)
An alternative hypothesis would be that cholesterol is a substance made by the body for the repair and health of every cell and thus something else had damaged the artery wall and cholesterol had gone to repair that damage. This is the hypothesis that has the memorable analogy – fire fighters are always found at the scene of a fire. They didn’t cause the fire – they went there to fix it. Ditto with cholesterol. The alternative hypothesis did not occur to the pathologists by all accounts
And second, because statins are one of, if not the most, profitable drugs in the world - estimated to be valued at US$ 14.1 Bn in 2020 and is expected to reach US$ 17.34 Bn by 2027 (by this website
While I'm in no way suggesting that you should stop taking prescribed medication - as I am not a medic - it's worth questioning the need for such drugs, especially if diet can help reach healthy levels.