CSA for step child

[helmaria]

Now my ex has a step child living with him, does this lessen my csa payments?

Has anyone else noticed that posters who post in defence of NRPs on here always always always resort to passive aggressive winky faces when it begins to get a little bit tough rather than actually answering questions? It's like a disease!

sock another issue I don't have unfortunately.

There won't ever be a DC shared by DH and I, no matter how much we may want one.

At least DHs ex won't have to worry about CM being reduced to take a half sibling into account - do you think she's grateful for that?

Between this board and SP, it's not a surprise MN has got a reputation as being home to a bunch of harpies. We really can't debate differences of opinion without it descending into insults and flippancy. My 13 year old DD can do better

basgetti funnily enough, i accept that there are crap dads and cro mums. I think I said that in a thread once.

But if crap dads don't support their DCs, the Mums here assure me that as the RP, they ensure that their DCs are provided for despite their dads failings. Whereas, if crap mums don't support their DCs, then NRDads have very little recourse.

I think Frog is a flaky, non maintenance paying NRP at heart.

You are a delight aren't you.

The last bit Basgetti. Froggy has a huge issue with RPs. All of the olive eating, gin swilling Manolo wearing bitches.

Tis funny to see the frothing/PA stuff . She never fails to deliver

It's funny how you are the one making the assumptions that all crappy NRP are Dad's.

I think we have all only referred to the shit parents as men when we have spoken about our own shitty ExP. The rest of the time it has been NRP.

I wonder what really goes on in your life. You may claim to be happy but you come across as fucking miserable.

If the alternative is to join the army of contact blocking, money-grabbing witches that are lone parents then my preference would be the former.

Of course, there is a middle ground, where most RP and NRP sit making the best of the imperfect system they find themselves caught in. would it be OK if I loitered there, instead?

I'm starting to understand the frustration of the practitioners who genuinely wanted to make a difference to family law in this country but who were shouted down at the debating table for daring to put a contrasting view. Those loud voices just aren't prepared to listen. It's no wonder the ministers involved jumped-ship at the earliest opportunity - it's a career cul-de-sac, despite being one of the most important issues facing this country.

Wine and olives, anyone?

The strange thing is Frogs, you have spend much of this thread downplaying and outright dismissing the importance of CM to RPs who in most cases have majority or sole care. Yet you claim CM despite having 50-50. Is that not a tad hypocritical? At one point that means you were claiming for a DC you had half the time and your DP paid bugger all for DCs who were full time with their mother. Did that never sit uncomfortably with you?

Money grabbing witches? Yes being a lone parent is so lucrative

Remind us again why you and your partners contact with his children has been blocked Frog ?

Money grabbing witches? Oh yes, trying to make sure our children have what they need and asking their other parent to contribute is so money grabbing. You're scraping the barrel a bit now in your desperation to offend.

Army now that's funny

I used to read your posts under your other usernames Frogs, and often liked them and felt bad for your situation. But I think the mask has slipped.

How is expecting 15% of the other parents income after his pension costs are removed money grabbing?

If the alternative is to join the army of contact blocking, money-grabbing witches that are lone parents then my preference would be the former.

Sorry to disappoint you my love. My ExH told me he didn't love DD and I should of had an abortion when I had the chance (even though she was planned, and he initiated the plan, not to mention we lost our first child) not surprisingly he doesn't want anything to do with my little girl.

He doesn't pay a penny either. Even though he works.

I am a bit of a witch though.

So I'll tell you what. Fuck you with your shitty assumptions. Go start a thread about supporting shitty parents, because regardless to your words that you throw about saying you don't. You do

I'd rather be apart of an Army with these women than compromise my morals and be like you, or quite frankly any of the shitty parents out there.

Monet has your DD returned with the booze?

would it be OK if I loitered there, instead?

Off you go sweetheart, you won't be missed.

According to a previous thread I came across last night (by accident I'm not that interested). You have been accused of EA have you not? I wonder fucking why. Report me I don't give a shit. It's the truth.

Meep Meep no. She just text me on her Iphone6 to say she'd stopped off at da bookies. It's only 456 miles out of her way. I hope she doesn't forget my fags

You have bookies open at this time? Jealous.

Ohh I remember now, you were trying to get me to explain to you how you could get your child's father to ignore the abuse allegations

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/1984565-To-think-we-are-entitled-to?msgid=44765715#44765715

Think there may be a few to add with regards to frog ;-) Not posting it on the thread as I would rather she crawled back into her toad hole :-D

Ooooops I clearly never meant to post that publicly. Ah well can't find a fuck to give.

Dead thread

More gin?

You're DD brought the gin home safely? (the gin obviously!)