Hello,
Wondering peoples experiences to see if it can relate. Hoping it can!
Myself and ex-partner share an 11 year old, separated since DC was approx 1 year old. We've had an informal agreement in place ever since. Ex-partner is attempting to change informal agreement, for reasons that are not safeguarding and already confirmed by ex-partner (in writing) aren't for safeguarding reasons.
The informal agreement works on alternating weeks, so to give an idea, this is how it looks outside of booked holidays, this is on a weekly regular basis:
Week 1 - ex-partner has DC Monday evenings to Friday mornings drop-off to school. DC is then with myself school pickup Fridays until Monday dinner/tea time.
Week 2 - ex-partner has DC Monday evenings to Saturday mid-afternoon. DC is then with myself from Saturday mid-afternoons until Monday dinner/tea time.
This is all they've ever known and been accustomed to. DC has siblings on both sides of the family. Child maintenance has never been missed and is calculated by the CMS with DirectPay. Holidays have always been a contentious issue, asking for dates so we can book things etc as we like to plan things way in advance, DC has had holidays both abroad and UK based with myself regularly for the past 10 years. Christmas day/Boxing day/New Years eve has been alternated each year. DC has recently missed a weekend break due to ex-partner going back on an agreement (via messages) where we swapped a day each.
We live approx 1 hour/46 miles away and myself does 95% of the drop-offs and pickups. I have always done this and have no problem doing it where safe to do so for the majority of the time.
Ex-partner is now attempting to reduce this existing agreement to the following:
Every week - ex-partner has DC Sunday early evenings to Saturday mid-afternoon. Myself to then have Saturday mid-afternoon to Sunday early evenings. Ex-partner has also attempted to "allow" approx 30% of school holidays to myself, whilst having the remaining 70%. Obviously I have not agreed to this, as I feel it doesn't feel it massively reduces adequate time for DC with myself and his siblings here and our wider family whom have built up strong relationships with DC.
Ex-partner has now stopped all physical contact, only "allowing" phone contact which they are "recording and supervising" and is refusing to allow DC to continue formalities unless we agree to new changes ex-partner has attempted to enforce. This is their justification for doing the above. They have also stated as DC is starting secondary school in September, that this serves best for DC. My point is that routine should be upheld, that is all they have ever been used to. It has never been an issue before now for such a long time.
As you would expect, we have applied for a formalized CAO due to all of the above, following legal advice and been told we have MIAM exemption. Ex-partner is now saying we must go to mediation and pay for all costs, which legals have told us is not the case.
Obviously we are very concerned at whats happening, DC has and is currently missing a lot of major scheduled events, not being able to bond with siblings DC has grown up with. Courts aren't very quick we know that but feel like we have no other choice! DC has also expressed to school they wish to see both parents and keep things as they are.
Based on the above, does anybody have any experience what courts may formalize? What could happen next etc?
Appreciate any advice!