bip I see you looking at the swimmers under the microscope, and I raise you DH proudly showing the consultant the video of his swimmers. I was quietly dying of embarrassment. But, hey, at least only one of us two is broken
wooty my consultant told me he'd also jacked open my cervix a bit extra after my hysteroscopy, as apparently my cervix snapped shut very easily, and after retained products post ERPC, he wanted to make sure any bleeding could come out properly. (I don't think he used the exact terminology 'jacked open'). Still. Not sure whether to be proud or not of having a tight cervix.
I too put on weight to try and improve my fertility. Dr said he wouldn't start treatment until I'd got my BMI up to minimum of 18. The irony was that post pregnancy I now am a BMI of 19. So I had to put on weight to try and get pregnant, turned out all I needed to put on weight was to be pregnant 
I did the full fat milk thing too. Because I loathe milk the only way I could get it down was to have it with nesquik like a child
I also tracked everything I ate during stims on MyFitnessPal as I'd read you needed at least 40-60g of protein a day. As well as eating shitloads of eggs for my eggs (as if chronic constipation from long term opioid therapy wasn't bad enough) I also bought some high protein ice cream called, I shit you not, 'Whey-hey'. I think adding that to my Ocado order was a new low
RE the orgasms thing, the 'upsuck theory' (that the contractions of orgasm make the cervix 'suck up' the swimmers) is apparently bollocks, but I read a fertility Dr say the likely reason women who have orgasms have higher pregnancy rates is that if they're having less crap sex they're probably shagging more often. Because as we all know. Shagging more often gets you a baby!! Oh no. Wait.
Thanks for the norethisterone tip Robber - my lining issues are pretty straightforward, it's an oestrogen thing for me. Years of the pill basically knackered my lining. So the oestrogen receptors in my lining ('antennae' as my Dr called them) were basically switched off. Dr said cumulative exposure to oestrogen would hopefully upregulate them and get the bastard to switch on. True enough that was indeed the case, as 2 months of progynova tablets while I was pregnant seemed to do exactly that. In my most recent fresh cycle in May my lining grew all by itself. To 11mm!!! The FET washout was not entirely unexpected. Dr said he's had some women who simply don't respond to artificial oestrogen on its own - there needs to be natural oestrogen in the mix too. Given my lining has responded in my fresh cycles, but didn't to the oestrogen pills or patches, that makes logical sense. Hence why we're stimming me - not to get the eggs, but to get the by product of the eggs, ie the oestrogen the follicles will produce. Feel pretty lucky to have a Dr that thinks outside the box. Obv having read most of the Internet on thin lining, see so many forum posts from women having FET after FET after FET cancelled because their lining hasn't responded. Many of whom say 'but my lining was great in my fresh cycle'. Yet their Drs just keep throwing more and more artificial oestrogen at them, when clearly it isn't working. And yet they know their lining thickens up when stimmed. Seems bloody obvious to me but apparently not. Anyway, I'm now back on the stims and hoping that ovaries like cantaloupes will thicken up the bastard lining
Even though I know fertility woo isn't going to make any difference, and if I get pregnant it's going to be down to science and luck, I'm obviously still booked in for acupuncture and mayan massage this week just in case