but all the bankers and lawyers interviewed for this piece will be paying tax here in the usual PAYE way, or, if on secondment in their country of residence. Sure, the one example quoted and quoted again throughout this thread is awful, but not representative of the people interviewed.
Again i say, it seems like the worst possible quotes have been taken, probably out of context, to make people seem as bad as possible.
People who run their own business have more leeway within the tax rules: but also have fewer benefits and safeguards. For example, the people i employ all get sick pay and maternity pay and i don't. And don't be fooled by corporation tax: IIUC you pay tax twice or even 3 times- once in a normal annual way, once when you take it out as salary and again if you sell the business. (although i am happy to be corrected on this, i am a sole trader)
Also, it is not only the people interviewed that believe a lot of the extra taxation has been frittered away. I do too. I believe that every penny spent should be accounted for, when you are spending taxpayer's money. But no, they set NHS targets based on almost anything other than outcome which to me as a healthcare professional seems ridiculous. And all of these nanny initiatives: i'd much rather that the money went to more deserving issues.If the money was spent more sensibly, we could afford to improve social mobility, give inner city teenagers something to do other than hang around in gangs and stab each other, (that was being helped by the lottery, but GB has raided that pot, too) have an NHS where the patient is treated as an individual not a statistic.
With GB feting the end of boom and bust in his initial time as chancellor, then spending everything in the good times, is it any wonder that people feel that money has been misspent? We need that money now to help people in fuel and food poverty but there is nothing less.