Russell Brand 🤢🤮 - crunch time

[KidsDoBetter]

Continuing the docky wock

don’t want to jinx it by referring to potentially Jaily Wail

Agreed. Odious man. Ive always felt there was something off about him. I watched a bit of his standup show once on dvd. Lasted 5 minutes and gave up. He showed his true colours in that Jonathon Ross incident. Should have put a restraining order on him then.
Booky wook in the bin!

Fingers, legs, eyeballs & internal organs crossed!

`He smacks of the David Walliams, doesn't he?

Another one who is currently 'topical', should rumours be true regarding a certain super injunction.

What will you all do if he walks?

Do you want every poster to reply individually about what they'll do or are you looking for a common concensus? If the latter, we'll have to confer off-line and get back to you with our response.

What can be done?

He will retreat back to Florida and his crazy corner of the internet.

If he’s found guilty I am hoping Dispatches has another doc ready to go with additional info / testimonies.

Certainly ITN has their Walliams doc ready to
go …

Be unsurprised because the British justice system is weighted against female victims, sage my own ears after hearing the disturbing victim testimonies via trial podcast, have a cup of tea, probably a biccie or two and look forward to karma slapping that bitch real hard.

Thanks for the new thread.

Watching and waiting with interest.

This bloke has always made my skin crawl. I have never seen the attraction with him what so ever 🤢🤮

I'm expecting him to walk, but cling to the hope that this won't be the case. If he does, well, I will be so disapointed for the brave women who went through the gruelling ordeal of giving their evidence and hope that they are cared for and supported.

Did they mention any police reports pre documentary? Even if they weren’t charged? As this is helpful for when more allegations come forward in building a picture. Often this is what happens to begin with big celebs like him!

Jimmu saville, Harvey Weinstein , Kevin spacey etc - hundreds of reports to police but they covered it up.

I was sexually assaulted but not rape years ago. My clothes were giving the wrong messages. Mini skirt and off the shoulder jumper. He was found guilty but suspended sentence because of how I must have encouraged him with my look
.... the system disgusts me.

Most rapists and men who sexually assault get away with it

Defence was crap (“it was only three rapes and thousands of others haven’t reported him raping them yet, well to the police anyway, you must ignore the dispatches ones”) so feeling quite hopeful about the verdict despite everything…
I stumbled on this video earlier
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dRJyNzakeHg&pp=ygUdUnVzc2VsbCBicmFuZCBpcnJpdGF0aW5nIHdpZmU%3D
this guy commentates on the Brands’ insufferable Sunday services. Just cracked me up, and felt sort of like a relief to hear someone else seeing the same shit I’ve been seeing.
also this is a fascinating one
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o2phdZWNLvo
in which Russell brand describes how he stormed off from his tiny children because they weren’t praying properly (?!) and we learn Laura had to “deal with it”, and also Laura homeschools them….
Cult. Cult. Cult!

(posted first on the old thread by accident, meant to post it here!)

These are very good - the commentator is funny tho of course it’s hugely disturbing.

They say the body keeps the score and he flags that LB starts each one of these Sunday services with a different ailment. He looks at her with utter disdain. The poor poor kids being denigrated for being unable to sit still and made to pray by this pair of charlatans. And homeschooled too. FFS

I've been listening to the BBC podcast on this - haven't listened to today's yet, but didn't the judge, earlier in the trial, say something about how a delay in reporting didn't have any bearing on the defendant's guilt or innocence?

I'm sure I heard something of the sort, in which case I don't understand how Winter has been allowed to say what he did today, implying that the delay in reporting puts the veracity of the claims in doubt.

Is this something the judge might address again tomorrow? I've realised I don't really know the ins and outs of how this works - and that most of the 'knowledge' I do have is gleaned from detective fiction of a bygone age.

i am agreeing here, I’ve been following it daily, and I think the defence summing up did better than the prosecution unfortunately 🤷🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️

@KidsDoBetteryes she is constantly ill! I think in one she says she’s been having nightmares as well. Her body is giving her all the signals, she just doesn’t want to read them…

The problem is, we can all say we think he'll be found guilty or not, but not one of us has all the evidence that was presented in court.
Additionally, we dont know the nuances or the tone used in each scenario.
We also don't know whether any of the women are well-known, esp the one who had two well-known witnesses of her incident.
If she's "famous", that is also a crucial factor of how the jury might view her case. Etc etc

Exactly

Just to start the day … here’s the only time Piers Morgan ever did anything useful. Highlighting the true depth and integrity of RB’s newly found Christianity.

Even name dropping Grylls couldn’t save him.

https://www.instagram.com/stories/crimeanalyst/4021761494115062557?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&psln=OXU2NnJsMGpubm5k

Either you are confused or I have misread you.

It means you should have no reasonable doubt of the person’s guilt. It is rightly a high bar but does not require certainty. It does require you NOT to have reasonable doubt. What counts as a reasonable doubt as opposed to some lower doubt is for you to decide.

I sincerely hope such a level is reached by the jury. The defence arguements are frankly an outrage.

Her husband does have upcoming rape trial.

Agreed and I have never understood how Jonathan Ross got away with that.

Well, sadly I do. All about money.

If you make enough money for others then they will turn a blind eye to anything.

See also Epstein, Jackson, Saville, Glitter, Harris, Kelly, West etc.

And let's remember the radio programme with the Sachs call was not broadcast live. The BBC chose to air it.

I was unfortunate enough to witness an acquaintance (who incidentally I'd had a very bad feeling about) state openly in a group of people that young women who dressed in tight skirts etc deserved 'all they got'.
Thankfully everybody present-men included - were horrified.
It beggars belief that even IF this belief is held anybody would voice it in this day and age.
In a way I'm glad he said it because IF this clown does do anything - and I hope not-there's witnesses, myself included, who'd gladly get up and speak for his victim.
Yes I clearly heard him say that how a woman dresses gives men carte blanche to do what they want.