That seemed to be the gist of it. As well as me supposedly claiming that ALL women 'freeze'. Not an assertion I made anywhere. Ridiculous, pathetic man.
But to go back to the issue of whether Brand was considered attractive or not, yes, he seems to have shagged a lot of willing women,and a lot liked him back in the day. Even if many of us personally found him fairly revolting.
But as Persephonia1966 rightly says, this has NOTHING whatsoever to do with whether he's likely to be a rapist or not. It is wholly irrelevant. Rape is about power and subjugation, not "your ability to get sex" (or not). This is absolutely basic knowledge about rape and what it is about. From what we've heard so far, Brand seems to have had a big thing about flouting boundaries and ignoring consent, not to mention 'sudden' attacks/changes, which several of his accusers have mentioned,. So yeah, that would easily fall into the coercion and 'rape' category. That appears to have included women who showed him little or no interest sexually AND some who did.
Because it's worth a reminder that even if a woman gives consent for sex that STILL doesn't meaning she has given consent for all and any sexual acts (eg anal). We are allowed to say no at ANY point and a man carrying on and not respecting that is a rapist. So idiots claiming that something like just going back to a hotel room is therefore consenting to sex and any sexual act he wishes to perform on them are way, way off the mark.