Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

James Bulger's mother demands right to find freed killers

1027 replies

suzywong · 28/11/2004 08:01

as reported in the \link{http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/story_pages/news/news1.shtml\news of the world.

Should she have the right?

Discuss

OP posts:
80sMum · 28/11/2004 16:46

When I was 10, I did a lot of things that I knew were wrong. Didn't you?
What those boys did was terrible in the extreme. But, even had they been fully aware of the enormity of their crime as they committed it (and I personally don't believe they were) they were nonetheless still childre. Children should not be treated the same as adults and tried as adults, simply because they arenot adults.

zephyrcat · 28/11/2004 16:48

Of course not tinker. But I just meant from my point of view - i couldnt let it lie.

jampot · 28/11/2004 16:49

So what if they had been 15 at the time of their crime - they would still be children then

hmb · 28/11/2004 16:49

Yes, and I still do things that are wrong now, I sometimes do 80 on a motor way. But there are limits, and we all know (including children) what the limits are. I never caused another person physical pain at that age.

I agree that they are children and yes it is different. I also think that they can change, I also think that it will not help anyone for that poor woman to find them. But I can't belive that they didn't know that what they were doing was wrong.

misdee · 28/11/2004 16:52

when do children become responsible for what they do? 16th birthday? 18th birthday, 21st?

when??!

hercules · 28/11/2004 16:54

Children are still naughty despite knowing that what they are doing is wrong. That doesnt stop them doing it.
To those who think they clearly knew what they were doing how do you explain why they did it?

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 16:54

It's a process of development - some are aware of their actions sooner than others. Just because they may have known it was 'wrong' doesn't mean that they understood that what they were doing was actually going to kill a baby and leave him dead forever. Not sure when the concept of 'forever' comes into play, but I know I couldn't tell the time till I was at least eight!

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 16:55

Hercules - this is where the 'evil' thing comes into play - these children were possessed by the devil and we must stone them to death, etc, etc. Real gutter press frenzy stuff.

Gobbledigook · 28/11/2004 16:56

Hercules 'being naughty' is a tad different to torturing and murdering a 2 year old.

hercules · 28/11/2004 16:56

Make sure they're caged at the same time.

hercules · 28/11/2004 16:56

So why do you think they did it?

hercules · 28/11/2004 16:57

It is easy to take our own set of morals and be shocked that these same morals are not shared by two abused, negleted troubled 10 year olds.

misdee · 28/11/2004 16:58

if the two boys had been from different backgrounds (well off, well treated, attended school, good students etc) would people be defending them in the same way?

Gobbledigook · 28/11/2004 16:59

Fine, OK then, they were perfectly lovely angelic children who just thought they were being a bit naughty and carried on anyway with no clue as to the consequences.

Believe that if you like.

hercules · 28/11/2004 16:59

I would certainly question what led any child to do such a thing.

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 17:00

Either they were fully aware of their actions and the consequences and are evil monsters who can never be rehabilitated, so should be in prison forever and ever.

Or they knew what they were doing, but didn't realise what the severity of the outcome would be, but with rehabilitation have understood and repent.

Or they had no clue what they were doing and no idea they were hurting anyone, in which case they should probably be in secure accommodation for the rest of their days.

I'd go with the second choice. I'd also say that as they've been released and have been said to be rehabilitated, this is the most likely option.

Gobbledigook · 28/11/2004 17:01

How the hell do I know why they did it?! I'm not a murderer!!!

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 17:02

So how should we judge the whys of this case? Ask murderers to do it?!

hercules · 28/11/2004 17:02

What?!

Angeliz · 28/11/2004 17:03

I could never understand why!
It's an evil act that i could ever in a million years understand.

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 17:03

Who's the "what" to? I was just surprised by GDG's comment.

80sMum · 28/11/2004 17:04

I think you're right, Hunkermunker. They knew it was wrong but didn't have a full understanding of the permanance of their terrible act. During police interviews, one of the boys asked whether 'the baby' had been 'made alive again.'

hercules · 28/11/2004 17:04

Do you really believe that they themselves knew why they did it? Is is so hard to believe that they were two extremely mixed up kids?

Gobbledigook · 28/11/2004 17:05

You asked me why I think they did it - how would I know? I don't know what drives 2 10 year olds to torture and murder a child - it's not something I ever contemplated doing myself, so, no, I can't tell you! I'm not sure anyone could tell you except them.

80sMum · 28/11/2004 17:05

I think you're right, Hunkermunker. They knew it was wrong but didn't have a full understanding of the permanance of their terrible act. During police interviews, one of the boys asked whether 'the baby' had been 'made alive again.'

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread