Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

James Bulger's mother demands right to find freed killers

1027 replies

suzywong · 28/11/2004 08:01

as reported in the \link{http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/story_pages/news/news1.shtml\news of the world.

Should she have the right?

Discuss

OP posts:
lavender2 · 28/11/2004 18:35

here here

Socci · 28/11/2004 18:36

Message withdrawn

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 18:36

What do people want to have happened? Bread and water? Ritual flogging? Perhaps they ought to have been publicly crucified?

lavender2 · 28/11/2004 18:38

not flogging but far less privelges

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 18:39

Why? To punish them? Being incarcerated is a punishment - I don't think they had a brilliant time as teenagers, do you? Frankly I don't think they'll have much of a life now either.

hmb · 28/11/2004 18:40

No, but I think if we can understand why it happened, and were given some details about why the authorities feel that the boys have been rehabilitated, then I think that people would feel much more secure that a. it is less likly to happen again , and b. that the boys have truly accepted responsibility for what they did and seek to have reformed life.

hercules · 28/11/2004 18:40

i agree hmn that the causes are important and should be looked at and learnt from.
What do people think would have been a more suitable punishment for two ten year old boys? Should they have been beaten regularly? Starved?

Is not been locked away for the rest of their childhood enough?

turquoise · 28/11/2004 18:41

Adult prisoners have some level of civilization in their incarceration - why should children be treated worse?

Heathcliffscathy · 28/11/2004 18:41

jesus! they were 10 and their lives totally destroyed! there were away from their families and friends from then on. they were 10!!!!

and they have to live with the fact of having tortured and killed a little boy for the rest of their lives. imagine if one of them has children? imagine the absolute horror and guilt they must feel as adults that have had long term intensive therapy? their lives are their punishment for what they did.

peskykids · 28/11/2004 18:42

well said sophable

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 18:42

Good point Turquoise. And Hercules, are you me?!

hmb · 28/11/2004 18:42

I think that one of the things that worries me is that the boys may seek to excuse their behaviour by not fully accepting responsibility for what they did. ( and I think this is also true of their parents) Because unless they do this, how can they learn better and move on to a better life?

peskykids · 28/11/2004 18:43

No, Hercules is me

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 18:43

How do you know they've not accepted responsibility?

Heathcliffscathy · 28/11/2004 18:43

why is it that these boys have been totally and utterly demonised but all the thousands of adults that abuse, hurt and murder each other every day are not? why is it that no husband that has beaten his wife to death has been demonised by the british press to this extent? it makes no sense at all to me.

peskykids · 28/11/2004 18:44

Isn't the issue of acceptance and recognition of the act usually one of the conditions of early release? And a sign of successfull rehabilitation?

turquoise · 28/11/2004 18:45

I totally agree Sophable. NOTW and its ilk has a lot to do with it.

Socci · 28/11/2004 18:45

Message withdrawn

hmb · 28/11/2004 18:46

I don't know, but I worry that them may not. While it is true that there may be a vast range of reasons that heped to 'drive' them to their actions, none is an excuse. While we must all have comassion for the condtions that they were placed it, they chose their actions and must accept responsibility, and then move on.

Society has far too many people trying to justify their actions.

yummymummy123 · 28/11/2004 18:47

No, I dont believe in 'an eye for an eye' and all that. And I doubt that if someone did get hold of those boys and beat them to death, James's mother would feel better.It's not going to bring her son back is it?.But surely if they'd gone to a prison where they'd had less privlidges and more time locked up-they did less than 10yrs for torturing a 2yr old!!She'd feel some sense of justice??

Heathcliffscathy · 28/11/2004 18:49

they did 10 years from the age of ten. half of their lives. and i truly believe that is only because of the furore surrounding the press coverage of this tragic case.

yummymummy123 · 28/11/2004 18:52

No they didnt do ten years. They were arressted in 1993 and released in 2001

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 18:53

I'm definitely not trying to justify their actions, but nor am I interested in condemning them utterly. I believe in rehabilitation, because that's the only way to have any hope in society.

turquoise · 28/11/2004 18:54

There can be no justice for a mother who loses her child like that. But in a decent society, the best outcome of such a tragedy is that the children responsible can be rehabilitated and reintegrated into that society, surely? Or else we are still in the dark ages of an eye for an eye.

hunkermunker · 28/11/2004 18:55

They have bodyguards not only to protect them, but also to protect those who might be vigilantes. They'd be murderers too, remember.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread