Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Archie Battersbee - Thread 4

1000 replies

BreadInCaptivity · 03/08/2022 00:09

Previous thread:

Archie Battersbee - Thread 3 http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/inthee_news/4601962-archie-battersbee-thread-3

OP posts:
SunflowerGardens · 03/08/2022 07:48

picklemewalnuts · 03/08/2022 07:46

Can someone tell me what to Google to understand the references to his mum's past/personality type? I only get the current sad situation.

I'm aware we can't discuss it here, or put links, or spell it out.

It's so distressing. I've managed to stay away from it so far, but as it continues I've got drawn in again at my better judgement.

Desperately sad.

There's a thread on another forum (kiwi farms) that has all the information

picklemewalnuts · 03/08/2022 07:48

It cannot be a luxury that only wealthy people can afford!

Only wealthy people can seek treatment outside the NHS, when the NHS is overburdened. Poor people are being disadvantaged by this situation. It's perfectly possible children who could be saved are dying, because of the fight to keep Archie longer.

picklemewalnuts · 03/08/2022 07:49

Thanks sunflower.

PomRuns · 03/08/2022 07:51

there are many behaviour similarities with CG. I know some of the team who cared for him.

OpinionsUnseen · 03/08/2022 07:53

Soontobe60 · 03/08/2022 07:45

What a terrible thing to say! This is a mother who’s desperately trying to hold on to her child. As a State, we should allow her the means to exhaust all legal avenues regardless of how we feel about the issue. It cannot be a luxury that only wealthy people can afford!

It may have been crassly put, but it’s a valid point. This is costing the taxpayer and the already overstretched NHS. And yes, it is possible that other children could die because of a dead child being kept on life support and that bed not being available and a seriously ill child having to be sent somewhere else for instance.

There is a potential danger here that if a child died because a bed at that hospital were not available, then the hospital could find themselves at the centre of another legal battle. If a parent is capable of suing to keep her child on life support, then a parent is capable of suing because their child has died due to a lack of that bed.

I’m not saying that it will happen, but it could.

Given this is now just about the CLC furthering their agenda and Archie’s interests have long since been forgotten, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that they should be charged for the cost of all this.

I’m not talking about the parents, but the over-funded, hideous vultures that are CLC.

nolongersurprised · 03/08/2022 07:53

EmmaGrundyForPM · 03/08/2022 07:28

Forgive my ignorance, but what is the difference between this case and, say, Tony Bland? Tony Bland was kept alive for years in a vegetative coma (apologies if those aren't the right words).

I'm with the hospital on this one, although feel desperately sorry for the parents, but am trying to understand why some people are kept on life support despite no hope of recovery, and others aren't.

The difference is that someone in a persistent vegetative state can breathe independently. They will need to have some form of tube feeding and carer to remove waste, care for the skin etc though.

Archie can’t breathe.

BongoJim · 03/08/2022 07:55

IDreamOfTheMoors · 03/08/2022 00:59

Surely they can’t keep her away? I read this morning the family wanting him moved to hospice and saying there were several security guards posted outside his room.
Could they get involved?

The only reason there are security guards outside is because of all the war talk she has been whipping up on social media. See a theme there?

Toosadtocomprehend · 03/08/2022 07:58

rocketfromthecrypt · 03/08/2022 06:46

She needs an awful lot of professional support, but I fear she's alienated herself from the very professionals best able to give it.

Agree

Witchesbelazy · 03/08/2022 07:59

OpinionsUnseen · 03/08/2022 06:43

@EasterIssland · is there really any need?

Bumping the thread like that is purely ghoulish and unnecessary.

It’s one thing to have a discussion and be part of it. Quite another to just bump the thread with a single letter.

There isnt a moral high ground here you're following along too just with more words.

Soontobe60 · 03/08/2022 08:01

Bigtitinmegarden · 03/08/2022 07:47

It was sad in April when Archie was found unresponsive with little to no brain activity, it was sad at the end of may when he was declared medically deceased, it was sad knowing the intensive and invasive treatments to keep his fragile body going, however it’s now cruel to keep this boy artificially stimulated enough where his body is being ravaged minute by minute and wasting away just so the family can have more ‘time’. I could never keep someone’s body in pain for my own sake, especially my own children’s.

As awful as it is I think it’s easier for the family to be angry at medical professionals and the justice system than it is to be at the person who’s care he was meant to be in on that fatal day or the fact their boy passed away, it’s a misdirected way to cope and a very unfair way to process grief.

Archie is brain-dead. He won’t be feeling any pain.

BashStreetKid · 03/08/2022 08:02

In some ways Hollie Dance reminds me of a woman who was the ante-natal ward when I was. She was generally quite demanding, and I had the impression that she went through life assuming the world revolved around her. She was utterly gobsmacked when it was brought home to her that the hospital regarded her baby's safety as more important than her comfort, with the result that they wouldn't induce labour or do a caesarian because she felt she'd had enough of being pregnant, nor would they prescribe anything that would harm the baby. When she was in labour she was furious essentially that they couldn't magic the whole thing away. That refusal to accept basic medical facts, or that someone else might have a more balanced picture of a child's best interests, is what is evident in Hollie's case.

Ijumpalot · 03/08/2022 08:03

Archie Battersbee: Who decides when life support ends? www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62390504

Samcro · 03/08/2022 08:05

sorry late to thread. (been lurking) can someone explain to me why disability is being used, he wasn't (as far as I know ) disabled when he had his accident. as far as I can make out he is brain dead now and being kept alive artificially,
so is that how they see disabled people?

EmmaGrundyForPM · 03/08/2022 08:07

Thanks to all those who answered my query about the Tony Bland case.

This case is desperately sad, but Archie's dignity needs to be preserved, and dragging this out doesn't allow for that. Well done to all the hospital staff who are doing their utmost.

MsBallen · 03/08/2022 08:08

So she's appealing to the court of human rights again today ffs. How much longer is this circus going to continue. When is enough enough? How can you think multiple UK courts, the UN and a good hospital and multiple Drs and nurses are all out to get your child for absolutely no reason at all?!

Bigtitinmegarden · 03/08/2022 08:10

@Soontobe60 I meant that the process of keeping his body stimulated will be causing injuries that would cause anybody pain, not necessarily Archie in his current state, my point is I couldn’t inflict such injuries to my own child, whether they could feel it or not, morally that wouldn’t sit well with me so I could bide time.

JenniferAlisonPhilipaSue · 03/08/2022 08:13

I'm a disabled person although not a wheelchair user.

I know other disabled people who have experienced traumatic brain injuries or brain tumours resulting in restrictions in speech and movement for example

They are not corpses and to compare them to one, (which is what Archie now is), is disgusting.

Motorina · 03/08/2022 08:15

Samcro · 03/08/2022 08:05

sorry late to thread. (been lurking) can someone explain to me why disability is being used, he wasn't (as far as I know ) disabled when he had his accident. as far as I can make out he is brain dead now and being kept alive artificially,
so is that how they see disabled people?

It's grasping at straws. Coming up with any vaguely plausible sounding argument to buy more time.

Legally, he isn't dead. I know that in every way that is meaningful he is, but legally he is still alive. He certainly isn't able bodied. He is in fact profoundly disabled, to the point he needs intensive medical support to do just about everything from breathing to managing how concentrated his pee is.

The argument is 'My son is disabled. Look! The UK has an appalling record in how it treats disabled people. My son is just another casualty in this.' It has just enough truth in it to be superficially plausible, particularly if you haven't been following the case, and so don't realise just how devastating the damage has been.

Soubriquet · 03/08/2022 08:16

MsBallen · 03/08/2022 08:08

So she's appealing to the court of human rights again today ffs. How much longer is this circus going to continue. When is enough enough? How can you think multiple UK courts, the UN and a good hospital and multiple Drs and nurses are all out to get your child for absolutely no reason at all?!

She won’t stop until Archie’s body gives up (which is what she wants), or the courts ban anymore appeals and the hospital turn off the machines.

Soontobe60 · 03/08/2022 08:16

picklemewalnuts · 03/08/2022 07:48

It cannot be a luxury that only wealthy people can afford!

Only wealthy people can seek treatment outside the NHS, when the NHS is overburdened. Poor people are being disadvantaged by this situation. It's perfectly possible children who could be saved are dying, because of the fight to keep Archie longer.

Theoretically yes, but does anyone know that for certain? My Aunt died several years ago whilst waiting for surgery to remove a blood clot on her brain. There were no intensive care beds available so surgery was postponed. My father, on the other hand, was successfully operated on for a Triple A even though the doctors told is there was only a 5% chance of success. There was an intensive care bed available at the point he was admitted into A+E.
Access to such services via the NHS is almost a lottery depending on many many circumstances. It’s not just limited to bed availability - is the best most experienced surgeon available or have they gone on holiday? Do the ICU / HDU wards have a full complement of well qualified nursing staff on duty every day? Do all the professionals have enough time to carefully assess the patients? Does the hospital have the latest technology available?
Many factors determine whether an outcome is successful or not. What we DO need though, is an NHS that isn’t just there to ‘save’ people, but one that also provides access to a dignified death. This child shouldn’t be in hospital, bed blocking. He should be in an end of life facility such as a hospice that also has provision to support someone on a ventilator. As far as I know, that doesn’t exist in this country.

loislovesstewie · 03/08/2022 08:16

If anyone started a collection for the staff on the ward, I would contribute, because I think they must be getting traumatized by this situation. Just to acknowledge them, really.

Samcro · 03/08/2022 08:20

JenniferAlisonPhilipaSue · 03/08/2022 08:13

I'm a disabled person although not a wheelchair user.

I know other disabled people who have experienced traumatic brain injuries or brain tumours resulting in restrictions in speech and movement for example

They are not corpses and to compare them to one, (which is what Archie now is), is disgusting.

thank you, so glad its not me. I wondered if I was taking it wrong as my youngest is severely disabled and has friend who have suffered brain injuries resulting is severe disability they are all very much alive.

BongoJim · 03/08/2022 08:21

BreadInCaptivity · 03/08/2022 01:13

Again I think that's unfair.

Recent interviews have been conducted outside the hospital.

I appreciate this situation garners some strong views but speculation about the family isn't helpful, nor is any "insight" into the backstory.

The family have the right to make the legal challenges they have made and it's appropriate they are allowed to do so.

It's vital that there is transparency in such cases precisely because it contradicts the rhetoric of social media zealots and that of a family who have (for whatever reason) lost trust in the medical professionals and the justice system.

On the contrary I think it is helpful to have a greater understanding of the larger picture as a lot of people are utterly incredulous at what they are witnessing but would understand it is not really anything unusual for this particular parent as it is part of a long running pattern of behaviour to garner such attention for herself and I think we are all agreed little of this seems to be about Archie anymore. Nobody with the best interests of the child would believe this latest hopeless appeal is to keep him in front of the cameras. I'm afraid the back story does present a very different perspective of what we are seeing. It may not that it changes anything but it does explain an awful lot.

Soontobe60 · 03/08/2022 08:23

Bigtitinmegarden · 03/08/2022 08:10

@Soontobe60 I meant that the process of keeping his body stimulated will be causing injuries that would cause anybody pain, not necessarily Archie in his current state, my point is I couldn’t inflict such injuries to my own child, whether they could feel it or not, morally that wouldn’t sit well with me so I could bide time.

Theoretically I agree with you. But I’ve never been in that situation. I’d hope that were I to find myself in his mother’s shoes I’d have the strength to let my child go, but I can’t say that with absolute certainty.
I’m a very pragmatic person - I don’t believe in prolonging an inevitable outcome, I believe in the right to choose when you die, I don’t believe in any religion or type of afterlife. I believe that end of life care needs a good overhaul in the NHS - hospitals should be about making people better, hospices about making peoples’ deaths better. But the funding for both institutions is woeful.

mydogisthebest · 03/08/2022 08:29

I hope Archie is allowed to be at peace today. His mother is not a caring mother she is a selfish mother. Her attitude to the doctors and nurses is disgusting and cannot be excused because of her grief.

The same was true of Charlie Gard's parents. He was kept on life support far too long and they also said vile things about the doctors and nurses caring for him.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.