Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Kate McCann offered a 'deal' if she confesses to killing madeleine

1018 replies

schnorbitz · 07/09/2007 21:13

HERE

OP posts:
LilianGish · 08/09/2007 13:10

So that's the answer on any "difficulty getting toddler to sleep" threads - use sedatives

flightattendant · 08/09/2007 13:11

Kits, apparently that's what happened...he saw the twins, assumed Madeleine was in the other room to get away from the crying, and didn't actually look...unbelievable, right?

haychee · 08/09/2007 13:11

But Kate wears such sensible shoes! She cant possibly be a child killer! is a joke btw

binkleandflip · 08/09/2007 13:12

I have used medised for dd when she is feverish or coughing so she could get rest - and yes - it is a godsend tbh. It's a proper medicine - sedatives in themselves aren't a dirty word. I cant say I agree with dosing children up just so you can have a bit of adult time in peace tho

flightattendant · 08/09/2007 13:12

Adding that this is only stuff I've read online - BBC, Guardian websites etc.

If Sky sensationalises I'd better not read it any more, as I didn't realise.

haychee · 08/09/2007 13:14

There really does appear to be quite a few serious holes in their story. Im still shocked though. Its unimaginable, unpredictable and horrific, not to mention downright scary - that we have all been sucked in and led to believe they are the victims. I hope to god we have closure soon one way or another.

SueW · 08/09/2007 13:15

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at OP's request.

orangehead · 08/09/2007 13:16

there is nothing wrong with sedating a child if required but then leaving a sedated child? its possible to have reactions such as laboured breathing even when u have previosly had same drug with no reaction. I dont agree with leaving young children fullstop but a sedated child should be monitored closely

binkleandflip · 08/09/2007 13:16

good point SueW, unless of course, they know that search would be futile.

lornaloo · 08/09/2007 13:17

But surely being doctors they would know this.

lornaloo · 08/09/2007 13:18

Oh totally agree with you there Sue. A private detective from the off.

flightattendant · 08/09/2007 13:20

I agree Orangehead. There are so many holes in the story anyway. It just doesn't sound like an evening you or I would have.

Would not leave the children.
Would not go to check and blatantly fail to do so.
Would not sedate the children, full stop.

(unless they were ill)

Oh, I don't know...it's all so bizarre and terrible.

ELMTREE · 08/09/2007 13:27

something in my head tells me something is not right with the whole scenario. How did the blood get under the sofa? why did kate wash maddies favorite toy? I know for one i would have wanted the smell of my daughter on it. What about the DNA found in the hire car?

flightattendant · 08/09/2007 13:30

Good point Elmtree, there is no way I would wash something of my child's if they were missing.

i have just been reading Gerry's blog. It is full of exclamation marks and sounds really cheerful. It makes me feel a bit sick, I can't understand why someone in his situation would want to publish something like this...'popped into church to pray' sort of thing, it's horribly 'I'm a great parent' and makes me very suspicious if anything..

I just don't get it. Something about protesting too much/

McEdam · 08/09/2007 13:39

No, Binkle, people who object to lurid speculation are not thickies who cannot understand that sometimes, very sadly, parents are guilty of harming their children.

My POV is that fabricating details about a very real little girl's disappearance for your own entertainment is nasty, to say the least. Read some crime fiction, or watch CSI, or something if you want that kind of stuff.

And kicking someone when they are down is pathetic. Most of all, the decent way to respond to the parents of a missing child is with sympathy unless and until it is shown as a fact that they are responsible.

haychee · 08/09/2007 13:40

Part of me hopes the poor girls end came while she was sleeping, not in any possible torturous way.
However going down this road, why would there be blood to find either in the apartment or the hire car if she had merey suffered an overdose? To consider the fact that she was bleeding leads to suspect an event far more violent.

tazmosis · 08/09/2007 13:42

Flightattendant - whilst not wanting 'to actively condemn anybody' you seem to be doing a pretty good job of just that.

By the way - remember Sally Clark anybody...?

ELMTREE · 08/09/2007 13:42

god hadnt even thought of that. Thats awful. I feel something will come out very soon that is incriminating to them.

flightattendant · 08/09/2007 13:53

Tazmosis, I'm condemning the blog I suppose...nothing else is known for sure, that's just speculation, and I'm sorry if it offends anyone, which well I'm pretty sure it does and I feel bad just speculating so will stop now.
But the blog is just awful. I am just saying I hate it.

Sorry.

flightattendant · 08/09/2007 13:56

Oh and I was condemning the fact the kids were left too. Probably a few more things as well.
Sorry. Will shut up now.

ELMTREE · 08/09/2007 13:57

Flight Attendant, dont be sorry, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Freedom of speech and everything. No one knows for sure what has happened. Will have to wait and see.

ArguidaCod · 08/09/2007 13:57

oh arent you arguidas
oh realyl
os ehind hte times

compo · 08/09/2007 14:12

Haychee - where do you get your info from?

BBC - "No bail conditions, travel restrictions or charges have been imposed on the couple. "

haychee · 08/09/2007 14:19

I did say, "I think.." didnt say i knew for certain. I thought they had to report in every so many days.

NKF · 08/09/2007 14:22

No-one's been charged you know. Just thought I'd put that in.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.