TM has no evidence to back her interpretation of the vote
Prior to the poll immigration was consistently polling as the top issue in determining how people would vote. There is evidence that the immigration numbers released shortly before referendum day had a significant impact on the outcome.
According to polling since the referendum the top 3 reasons for voting leave were:
- decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK
- regain control over immigration and borders
- remaining meant little or no choice about EU expanding membership or powers
Whilst it is not the case that all Leave voters were concerned about immigration it is clear that many of them were, as indeed were significant numbers of Remain voters.
I think it is not unreasonable to assume that the electorate are unhappy with free movement and want some controls in place. That means an end to free movement. It does not necessarily mean an end to all movement.
And, of course, inasmuch as the government is saying anything at the moment (and they are trying hard not to say too much) they are setting out a negotiating position.
I have no problem with people campaigning in favour of Europe. However I do not think there should be a second referendum or that parliament should block Brexit. That smacks of asking people again until they give the "right" answer - one of the things that puts people off the EU.