Miliband is treating his reply as if speaking within the Oxbridge Student debating society, as so many mistruths wrapped up in rambling rollocks, it .
On average families worse off, well as the the wealthiest are paying more, surely that INCREASES the figure, and where would we be IF WE HAD LABOUR TAX INCREASES FOR 5-YEARS, rather than tax cuts?
And his claim that the near bankrupt state he handed over had built less homes than them through the global boom with £hundreds of billions to spend on fat government WELL LOOK AT THE FIGURES, especially for 2004 when we opened our doors to 500 million new citizens;
Using Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLC) figures, and using the full 18-year term of the last Conservative government (including a few recessions) but only the first 11-years under Labour (before the worst recession in nearly a century), the Conservatives averaged 50,761 new social housing sector homes a year, while the last Labour government averaged 24,299 per year.
Putting the decline rate in context, the new social housing sector build HIGH was 88,530 new homes in 1980 (around the time ‘Right to Buy’ was a policy) and the LOW was 130 new social homes in 2004 at the height of an immigration boom – no doubt STILL selling off Right to Buy Homes, with a resulting large NET REDUCTION of council housing stock for that year.
And the bedroom tax or Spare Room Subsidy, Miliband had no firm policy to help the 5 million needing social homes in 2010, never mind try and release 800,000 spare bedrooms - so as usual, Labour had no answers in 2010, and their 5- pledges in 2015 are an unrealistic joke.