In the olden days (you remember, about 15 years ago) very few women wore hijab in the UK, let alone were veiled. I was discussing this with a colleague today - 3 of us who had worked in a girls school where most of the pupils are Bangladeshi muslims seperately estimated the number of girls wearing hijab 15 years ago, 10 years ago, 5 yars ago and now. 15 years ago, about 1 girl in eac class wore a flimsy sort of hijab. they covered their headss with their chiffon 'unnas' when they went into the street, maybe. (the scarf that goes over the chest and shoulders with a shalwar kameez). Now 90% of the girls wear a proper 'under the chin' hijab of thick cloth. And the big change has come since the community felt so under threat in the fall out after 9/11.
In the olden days Muslim Asians (the asian was more identified than the religion) were seen as the hard-working, heads-down, high-achieving-in-schoools ethnic group. Running shops and small businesses, or like my PILs working hard at rock bottom wages for the NHS and British rail, all in order to make a good life for their children. Being quite 'meek'. 'Pakis' to some, 'they keep themselves to themselves, don't mix much' to others, but generally, amongst reasonable people in this country, no one wanted to say much that would have been construed as racist - unless they were deliberately racist folk - because there wasn't much of an issue. Not anywhere I have lived, anyway.
But a foreign policy led by the USA and sucked up by the West with the UK as first runner-up, and a bunch of murderous radical fundementalists, and the picture has changed.
Can people really not conceive of increased hijab / veil wearing as a deepened affinity to identity through religion and/or an ncreased need to assert a political identity in the face of our foreign policies, and in the face of the aftermath of 9/11 and then again after the London bombings last year?
That this is a development which is the result of a two-way dynamic. Of course nothing should be beyond dialogue, nothing should be 'undiscussable' - but at what point does villifying women for wearing cloth over thier faces just add to the creation of a divide?