My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

News

Part 3: Israeli-Palestinian conflict

961 replies

AndHarry · 26/07/2014 16:54

New thread as part 2 is nearly full.

Part 1 is here.

Part 1 was started when 3 Israeli boys were found murdered.

Part 2 is here.

In part 2 we mainly discussed the legality and human consequences of Operation Protective Edge.

OP posts:
Report
MarmiteMania · 27/07/2014 14:03

Timbuktoo I will have to bow to your superior knowledge of my opinion

Report
zinher · 27/07/2014 14:05

The israeli settler who shot at and killed a protestor in West Bank, will she be prosecuted? I haven't heard anything else about it.

Report
EllenMumsnet · 27/07/2014 14:08

Hi all. Just to let you know that we've deleted a few 'Fuck offs' as they break the Talk Guidelines when directed at specific MNers.

FYI, this thread is generating a lot of reports, and we are doing our best to read them all individually and in context, so it may take a bit of time to respond to and/or action all of them.

In the meantime, this is clearly a very complex subject and emotions often run high; we really don't want to stifle debate - so please, please remember our guidelines.

Thanks for bearing that in mind Thanks

Report
somewheresafe · 27/07/2014 14:20

A lot of the arguments have been discussed at length in the first two threads. Especially the 'what would you do if you were israel and facing rocket fire everyday?'

Ditto human shields, self defence etc. It might be helpful for new posters to the thread to read the previous threads first.

Report
MarmiteMania · 27/07/2014 14:25

Take your point somewhere I will have a look

Report
babbas · 27/07/2014 15:40

My family in Israel told me that during the last few weeks life has been going on as normal. They have been to work, birthday parties, the beach etc. They have had to walk to their spare room shelter twice but have felt very safe. Meanwhile in palestine it has been a scene from hell. Although the press is very controlled in Israel social media is allowing those within israel to wake up and see the human side of the massacre.

The photo attached is doing the rounds on twitter and really highlights the point that this is not a war. It is unilateral massacre of a nation. There are no nuances. All the lies of israel have been laid bare. Many Israelis are fuming that the death of the 3 teens has been used by bibi in this most despicable way.

Part 3: Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Report
Yruapita · 27/07/2014 15:46

Small, silent protests in Israel. According to this article, israeli protests for Gaza are diminishing. It also states how Israeli politics have legitimised extremism. apparently most Israelis do not understand the context of the occupation.

www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/26/gaza-israel-palestinian-protest

Report
zinher · 27/07/2014 15:58

Yrupita that was thoroughly depressing read. It is in line with channel 4 reports that the suffering of innocent Palestinian is not seen by the Israelis and they want IDF to finish the job which I assume means kill all Palestinians

Report
Yruapita · 27/07/2014 16:07

Ignorance prevails in Israel, what with the media and the policies. They all ensure that Palestinians are not to be considered human. I do believe that if the brain washing could be stopped, the most Israelis would be horrified at the grotesque campaign of terror that their government has perpetrated in their name.

Report
AndHarry · 27/07/2014 20:14

My question though is about balance? What would have been a proportionate response of Israel[?]

It's a fair enough question IMO; I don't know why 80schild is getting slated for it. I'll have a go at answering to the best of my knowledge. I'm sure I'll be told in no uncertain terms if I'm wrong :o

The question itself is based on the idea of a 'response'. A response to what? The final trigger point I suppose was the rockets being launched from Gaza after the bodies of the 3 murdered Israeli boys were found. Those rockets were in response to the Israeli police and security forces arresting around 350 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, including many civilian leaders belonging to the Palestinian Authority leadership in the West Bank. Israeli law allows for certain prisoners to be held without charge for up to 6 months. During the arrests, security forces searched civilian homes, businesses, universities and clinics and confiscated millions' of dollars worth of property. Two Palestinian civilians were shot dead and 11 injured. Quoting from The Economist now: "The Israeli security forces closed off the area around Hebron. Some 23,000 local Palestinians were barred from travelling to their jobs in Israel. A series of charitable organisations that used to be run by Hamas were closed down and a dairy, which employs hundreds of Palestinians, was demolished. Hebronites were prevented from travelling abroad."

Let's consider that for a moment. Three boys are kidnapped (one of the boys phoned the police from his mobile phone to report the kidnapping). Let's re-locate that crime to the UK. Three English kids are kidnapped in, say, Swansea (similar size population to Hebron). What would be the response? A huge search operation, GCHQ and MI5 called into play, refined intelligence and mobile phone signals being used to track and find the boys, pinpointed arrests. Not 350 arrests including most of Swansea Council, not a couple of Welsh people being shot dead, not 11 more injured by the police, not homes, businesses, Swansea University and a few GP offices being ransacked, not placing the whole of Swansea in lockdown, not preventing locals from commuting to Cardiff, not demolishing the HSBC building, not banning Swansea folk from going abroad.

Let's have a look at the political reaction during the search for the boys. The obvious answer for the Israeli government was that the kidnappings were the work of Hamas. Benjamin Netanyahu announced that he 'knew for a fact' that Hamas was responsible but did not produce any proof. Hamas vehemently denied all involvement and it is now fairly widely acknowledged that the Hamas leadership weren't involved at all. Various inflammatory statements were thrown around e.g. the Economic Minister said that Israel would make joining Hamas 'a ticket to hell'. Israel's Deputy Minister of Defence threatened 'possible actions' against (Palestinian) Ramallah and Gaza.

Moving on... The bodies of the 3 boys were found in a field. Later that night Israeli security forces blew up the homes of the two main suspects and their families. Going back to our imagined scenario in Swansea, can you imagine the army blowing up a couple of semis because earlier in the day the police had arrested two suspects living there with their wives and children?

Once the boys were found, the rhetoric on both sides was stepped up. That was when I started thread 1, in absolute despair at the Israeli government's reaction. I've read through that first post a few times as I've considered the different pieces of information presented through the different threads and concluded that my opinion hasn't changed. Allowing the situation to escalate so far, to use such inflammatory rhetoric, was not the action of a responsible, peace-seeking government. I still think that this terrible campaign could have been avoided had the government been rather more measured in its response and kept their mouths shut until they knew the facts rather than making up their own from which they could not back down without seeming weak to their electorate and the international community.

What would the right reaction have been? Allowing the security agencies to conduct their search and recovery operation with respect for civil rights and keeping politics out of it. Enlisting the cooperation of the local authorities rather than arresting them. Handing the eventual 2 suspects (from a round-up of 350 remember...) over to be dealt with by the criminal justice system.

Hamas started firing rockets the day after the boys were found. Do you still think they 'started it'?

OP posts:
Report
TheHoneyBadger · 27/07/2014 20:22

i think she was getting slated for her flagrant islamaphobia actually.

all muslims are not part of some big umbrella terror organisation. also how do you say over a thousand people have been killed in the most densly populated 25mile strip of land on earth which is inescapable? how is it possible for that not to be emotive unless you are a psychopath?

Report
TheHoneyBadger · 27/07/2014 20:24

i'm trying to think of an unemotive way to say that babies have been killed with bombs, with close range weapons, buried under buildings, filled with shrapnel etc.

how does one talk about hundreds of children murdered in their homes or schools or hospitals in a way that doesn't evoke emotion?

Report
PigletJohn · 27/07/2014 20:29

Very true and sensible, AndHarry.

There is an alternative answer, but only if 80schild ever comes back and answers my question of 13:24:12

Report
mathanxiety · 27/07/2014 20:30

Anyone from SA care to comment on the song 'I've never met a nice South African'?



Was it a caricature?
Was it flippant in the face of suffering?
Report
mathanxiety · 27/07/2014 20:35

Sherazade
Why do you consider Yasser Arafat a traitor?

Report
PigletJohn · 27/07/2014 20:40

I agree, TheHoneyBadger.

There is a worrying undercurrent of anti-Islamicism in here, though luckily, from very few individuals.

AndHarry, that was a well-balanced post.

Report
AndHarry · 27/07/2014 20:44

math I'm not a Palestinian or in any way linked to the Palestinian people but I consider Arafat to have been a 'traitor' because he made promises at peace talks that he then failed to deliver on, thus undermining the Palestinian side because Israel could say that it was useless to negotiate with them (particularly about the clause in the Hamas charter that calls for the destruction of Israel, which Arafat promised to have removed and then didn't) and because he died one of the wealthiest men on the planet while his people scraped by in poverty and want.

OP posts:
Report
PigletJohn · 27/07/2014 20:44

zinher, yes, if killing and maiming a few thousand Palestinians does not have the effect they want, and if they are resolved not to try any alternative method, they will have to carry on until they have killed the lot.

Report
mathanxiety · 27/07/2014 20:46

Sherazade
'Hamas money- what little they have- is spent on infrastructure and social welfare.'

Were the rockets donated then?
If so who donated them?

Report
TheHoneyBadger · 27/07/2014 20:51
Report
PigletJohn · 27/07/2014 20:51

It's very depressing that one of Hamas' demands is for Gaza fishermen to be allowed to take their boats a few miles out to sea.

How frightful that a community of fishermen are prevented by Israel even from being able to do that.

It should not even need to be a demand.

There again, next time, they might include a "demand" that children be permitted to play football on a beach, or families to have a picnic, without being shelled to bits by the Israeli gunboats.

Report
halfdrunkcoffee · 27/07/2014 20:55

Thanks for that AndHarry. I think all your posts have been really well-written, balanced, knowledgeable and informative.

(Although I read (misread?) 80schild's question to mean what would have been a proportional response by Israel to the Hamas rockets - though maybe there wouldn't have been any rockets if the boys' murders hadn't happened or if the Israeli government had not reacted in the way that it did).

38 Degrees are asking people to email the defence secretary, Philip Hammond, with their thoughts on Gaza

Report
halfdrunkcoffee · 27/07/2014 20:58

Foreign secretary, sorry

Report
PigletJohn · 27/07/2014 21:04

A very useful video, HoneyBadger, which should be more widely distributed, though I doubt it will be popular among those who most need to see it. It's great that he can nail the lies that are still being pushed today, without risk of being called antisemitic.

Report
AndHarry · 27/07/2014 21:04

I'd like to go back to earlier in the thread when someone criticised Egypt for now opening its border with Gaza. It's only the Red Sea tourist resorts of Sharm el Sheik et al that have been declared 'safe' (can you imagine the economic disaster if they weren't?). The Sinai peninsular is a very volatile place right now, full of armed groups with various conflicting aims and none, who I would not want to see getting into Gaza. There are plenty of extremely dangerous young men who have been frothed up by the images of Palestinian Muslim suffering who would love to get in there and whose presence would give weight to the Israeli government's refusal to take down the wall purportedly constructed for the safety of Israeli civilians. If I were a Palestinian civilian I would not want those armed groups in Gaza either, them not being known for their loving kindness and excellence at nation building and all...

Apart from that, the pressure on the Egyptian government is immense. As well as the harmless smuggling of construction materials, food etc., there's no denying that those tunnels were used for smuggling arms into Gaza. Egypt has an uneasily friendly relationship with Israel, who are in a state of more or less intense hostility with most of its neighbours and have occupied Jordan (now friendly-ish), Syria and Lebanon when they've felt threatened. Israel once included the Sinai peninsular within its borders. With a right-wing government in power I imagine that Egypt have no wish whatsoever to antagonise them.

Last point on Egypt. Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, who disowned them and made peace with Israel. Despite this, it's worth noting that the present Egyptian government has deposed a Muslim Brotherhood leader and locked up, exiled and ordered the execution of Muslim Brotherhood members on the street. In such circumstances I consider it extremely unlikely that they're going to start making friendly overtures to Hamas. If Hamas does go ahead with handing control of Gaza over to Fatah to create a unity government then maybe the situation will change.

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.