I'm struggling to articulate my thoughts on this so apologies if it comes out all wrong.
I don't agree with Israel's justification for bombing civilians based on 'intent'. Bibi says that that's the difference between what Israel and Hamas are doing: 'They fire indiscriminately at our civilians and our cities in order to attack them. Sometimes they hit soldiers by mistake. We strike at their armed forces and sometimes we hit civilians by mistake'. The thing is, it isn't 'sometimes', it's almost every time.
The last figures I saw were over 100 dead, 77 of which were civilians. That surely can't be an acceptable figure? I can't see how it can possibly be justified to launch an air strike knowing that for every 1 militant killed, 3 civilians will die too, including children and the disabled, who cannot possibly evacuate to a safe distance in under a minute. It's disingenuous to blame all civilian deaths on the Palestinian militants when you know those ratios.
I don't really understand this minute warning thing. That's plenty of time for able-bodied men who are used to being shot at to jump out of a window and scarper. Not enough time to wake up a sleeping woman and for her to grab her children and get beyond the blast range. I said if it was me it wouldn't be enough time but I would try. In actual real life, I don't know. Would I panic? Would my militant husband insist that I gathered the children on the roof and that would save us and our home? Would I be so worn down by years of suffering and trauma that I would rush up there to shout defiance at the enemy before they blasted me to oblivion? I don't know. If I had more than 2 children, or more than 1 family in the house, it certainly would not be enough time. What about if a militant took the call and decided not to tell anyone, that the images would be worth it in terms of propaganda for the greater cause?
If the warning is for everyone to leave and just weapons to be destroyed then they could give a minute longer, couldn't they?