Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Rebekah Brooks charged :)

348 replies

NicholasTeakozy · 15/05/2012 10:13

Short version here I'll have a dig for more details. Oh happy day! :o

OP posts:
Nancy66 · 16/05/2012 15:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

boohoohoo · 16/05/2012 15:35

Oh Nancy, I believe you`ve just made my day! Grin

cakeismysaviour · 16/05/2012 15:49
EldritchCleavage · 16/05/2012 15:55

RB does look a bit Prisoner Cell Block H, come to think of it.

cakeismysaviour · 16/05/2012 15:58

I'm doing a nice classic black and white. Rebekah wouldn't suit orange.

cakeismysaviour · 16/05/2012 16:05
Grin
cakeismysaviour · 16/05/2012 16:06

Its tough in jail

Ponders · 16/05/2012 16:40

RB does look a bit Prisoner Cell Block H, come to think of it

that's exactly what DH said last night, Eldritch Grin

this is the MN schadenfreude thread (& long may it continue)

FrankWippery · 16/05/2012 16:44

There is so much more to come and it pleases me enormously.

MrsGuyOfGisbourne · 16/05/2012 17:10

noddy - completely agree Grin I don't nor nally wallow bitchily in schadenfreude, but these people have it coming to them big time. Who was it who said you can fool some of the little people some of the time... or summat. The revelations are going to be far-reaching.

MrsEdinburgh · 16/05/2012 17:38

Yes I agree with MrsGuy.

As much as I dislike her brand of "journalism", Rebekah Brooks is Rupert Murdoch's & David Cameron's Fall Guy.

It ain't over 'til the red headed lady sings.

Greythorne · 16/05/2012 19:19

I am amazed more of her former employees have not spoken out about her, tbh

BornSicky · 16/05/2012 19:54

greythorne give them time... Wink

but, also, some of them may be concerned that they weren't whiter than white either. No idea how endemic this was.

I'll be very interested to see what other charges emerge and against who after Leveson.

FrankWippery · 16/05/2012 20:23

Yep, give them time indeed. WinkGrin

MrsGuyOfGisbourne · 16/05/2012 20:43

Have to say I do feel sorry for the driver who is also indicted - I can't imagine he had much say in any alleged wrong-doing, or be a criminal master-mind. I know that 'just obeying orders' is no defence in criminal proceedings, but kinda a fell that if a boss like hers tells you to eg carry some boxes, you're gonna do it or be fired...

QuickLookBusy · 16/05/2012 20:50

Agree with you Mrs.

It's a shame there can't be some kind of deal where employees will be immune from prosecution if they spill the beans on what they were "ordered" to do.

hiveofbees · 16/05/2012 21:12

We dont know what will happen between now and this going to trial, chages could be dropped or altered. Its possible that there is still a bit lot going on behind the scenes.

limitedperiodonly · 17/05/2012 07:22

If you could escape prosecution by saying you were under pressure from a superior then a chief executive could say the board told him to do it. And the board could say God was talking to them.

Everyone is a little person to someone, even Brooks.

To have a reasonable chance of conviction the CPS would have to show that people weren't just carrying boxes with no idea what was inside them. They must believe they can do that.

If convicted, anyone can argue they were coerced and didn't stand to gain the benefits of their superiors. If true it would be taken into account on sentencing.

But much as I feel sorry for anybody under pressure to do anything, you can't say: 'Oh well, we'll let you off then.'

The law says you have to say: 'Get stuffed. I'm going to the police and I'll take the consequences of anything I've done up until now.' That's how it should be otherwise, where would we be?

I imagine they've not stopped wishing they did that since the arrests.

limitedperiodonly · 17/05/2012 07:56

And there is an immunity of sorts. It's informally known as the Whistle-blowers' Act and if it's ever used it's usually by people who have to protect themselves from retribution from their employers for exposing major wrong-doing for the public interest.

But they have to bite the bullet and risk the sack and worse, nothing improving, as a result of spilling the beans.

Much as I sympathise, I can't see how helping to conceal things from the police on behalf of an employer qualifies.

bochead · 17/05/2012 08:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

Nyac · 17/05/2012 09:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

NicholasTeakozy · 17/05/2012 09:14

Has Coulson been charged? Great if he has.

I think the Brooks are having a surrogate birth, but stand to be corrected.

OP posts:
hiveofbees · 17/05/2012 09:18

I think that the baby has been born - in January?

Nyac · 17/05/2012 09:21

I thought I'd read upthread that he had. Hope so.

Swipe left for the next trending thread