Top intelligence analyst for Yorkshire police says 7/7 was false flag

[Kurkum]

Top police intelligence whistleblower is sacked for reporting to his seniors that 7/7 has the hallmarks of state terrorism.

"Tony Farrell had been employed for twelve years as ?Principle Intelligence Analyst? for South Yorkshire Police, 13th largest of the 44 police forces in the UK. His job involved producing a yearly ?Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix? to determine how the police force had to prioritise its activities.

Assessed ?threats? ranged from ASBOs (anti-social behaviour orders) to the terrorist threat presented by local mosques. Having a statistics degree, it was his job to translate the different ?strategic threats? into a ?matrix? of relative numerical weighted probabilities.

In 2010, one week before the 5th anniversary of 7/7, Tony (who had never previously doubted government versions of events) stumbled across ?9/11 Truth? material on the web. Like so many millions before him, he was shocked to the core by this experience. He quickly realised that there was a great mass of evidence relating to 9/11 kept hidden by the mainstream media. As a Christian, Tony consulted his church minister, who suggested that he consider, whether the same might be true for the London 7/7 bombings?

Something he had not suspected ?in his wildest dreams? then started to unfold. After reading much of the available but publicly-unreported witness statements and other evidence relating to 7/7, Tony found that he could only conclude that the official 7/7 narrative was ?a monstrous lie.? Instead of the official ?suicide bombers? narrative, which he and all of his colleagues had believed without question, he realized that the weight of evidence strongly points far more towards 7/7 being an event stage-managed by British intelligence than anything else."

Watch an interview with Tony Farrell and read the rest of the article:
www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/10/uk-police-intel-expert-government-not-islam-real-terror-threat/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=uk-police-intel-expert-government-not-islam-real-terror-threat

"There was a woman who died on a train heading towards Kings Cross, for example. How could that be explained by the government's version of events?"

The blast happened within the station: news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4671767.stm

And that's how the eastbound train was damaged.

For that to not be true every single passenger and person who was at that station would have to be involved in the cover up. Every single survivor on the trains, every single person on the platform, every single station worker, every single emergency services worker and every single worker who helped clear up in the aftermath.

Or alternatively you could be talking bobbins. Not just bobbins, offensive bobbins. You're looking every single one of the hundreds of people who say the trains were in the station and saying "liar" right at them.

There are some very strange things about the bombings which we should question. However throwing around utter nonsense about what happened to Jenny Nicholson breaks your chances of being taken seriously and does enormous harm to those who do want to question the official line.

So please, if you do want to help those who believe that there are questions left unanswered get yourself informed before blasting away on public forums. As if all you've achieved is to leave more evidence on the internet that those who doubt the official version of events are ill informed nutters who can be safely ignored.

Those who really do believe there was a serious cover up could even paint you as someone who is helping in that cover up by doing such great damage to the chances of the doubters being taken seriously...

Badgerspaws, here's what TFL wrote to Bridget Dunne:

'A fourth train, a Hammersmith & City line train, at Edgware sustained damage, while passing Circle line train 216 when the device exploded. No fatalities or injuries were recorded on the Hammersmith & City line train.'

She comments:

'The trouble with the 'only passengers on train 216 were injured or fatalities' answer is that it doesn't explain how Jenny Nicholson was killed travelling from Paddington to Edgware Road.'

bridgetdunnes.blogspot.com/2006/05/3-trains-at-edgware-road-updated.html

She also points out other serious contradictions with the official narrative regarding the Edgware Road bomb.

Is Bridget Dunne an ill-informed nutter?

And why would Islamic fundamentalists target a station in an area of London famed for its Arab community?

Edgware Road, known as London?s Little Cairo

Bridget Dunne was profiled in the Guardian. A conspiracy theorist who's 'jus saying that maybe the bombers were photoshopped into the CCTV pics.
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/jun/27/july7.uksecurity?INTCMP=SRCH

A lot of the conspriacy theories seem to be no more than 'well this was said in 2006 and the narrative is now different'. There was a huge amount of confusion, media speculation and downright error which took a long time to unravel. As a very minor example my London office was virtually locked down on 7/7 - I've still got an email from work security issued that morning about a bomb explosion at Liverpool St. I've always put that down to initial confused and erroneous media reports. According to David Minahan that was clearly one of the 4 to 13 additional bombs which went off, but were covered up.

As for Jennifer Nicholson her body was found on the track at Edgeware Rd. Here's a media report from the inquest. If she wasn't killed as stated, you have to believe that someone planted her there and/or the paramedic and policeman quickly on the scene were involved in the conspriacy.
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/19/7-july-inquest-police-officer?INTCMP=SRCH

Edgeware Road may host a lot of Middle Eastern tourists, shops and residents, but this was a bomb timed to hit a busy commuter train. Although the bomb killed people of all faiths and nationalities, if you look at the names and profiles of those killed in that particular explosion, they're all bog standard London commuters with anglo saxon names, all on their way to work. Very few people would be getting off or on at Edgeware Road at that time of the morning. The tube was full of Paddington commuters.

some kind of huge power surge

You are saying then that it was a Zat'nik'tel (Zat gun from Stargate) that was used?

Perhaps it was the government experimenting with running trains using flux capacitors but without the required 1.21 gigawatts of power it just all went wrong?

Alternatively some extremist nutters blew up the trains and bus and left videos claiming responsibility. In the ensuing confusion some incorrect statements were made by the government, emergency services and the press.

Dammit, got sucked in need more willpower.

Catkinsthecatinthehat has it covered.

Whatever happened, one thing is certain -- lots of people died and suffered on that day. But to certain posters here it's all just a big joke.

It is NOT a big joke! How dare you say that. Just because some are suspicious of the conspiracy theories, does not mean that they do not consider what happened to be the height of awfulness.

FYI, I was on the train before the first one to explode.

I am making fun of conspiracy theories, not the event.

Were we discussing conspiracy theories? I thought we were trying to have a serious conversation about the problems with the Home Office's version of events.

"Were we discussing conspiracy theories?"

Yes, pretty much the very dictionary definition of a conspiracy theory. The official version of events is being rejected, attempts are being made to explain things that some are claiming the official story cannot, the people who believe (on the whole) the official story are dismissed as being naive, the bigger cover ups being hinted at would have to be a very large number of people involved all of whom are lying and there appears to be a certain tone of self congratulation that the plot has been seen through by a small "informed" clique.

Conspiracy theory.

That's not meant in the derogatory term that it's sometimes taken to mean by the way. Some conspiracy theories are true. But the bigger one being talked about here isn't.

I'm a bit less tactful. For every major event you get a few people repeating really ridiculous stories about it. What they all share is an inability to do joined-up thinking and a desire for attention.

It's important to make it clear to other people reading that these stories are not representing a real minority opinion, but are just something a handful of people read on the internet and are repeating.

This is the stuff people email to each other. "Kennedy didn't die and now secretly runs Tescos. Email all your friends now and tell them what THEY don't want us to know!"

Well, the unions were not in on any cover-up, and they would have had to have been for any massive suppression of the truth such as those suggested here, to work.

I know from a friend who was then a senior officer in a transport union that their national committee rallied round to get information and instructions to bus and train drivers and other transport staff about whether and how to carry on working that day.

These workers were not sheep following some government line and agreeing to cover up. Their union was NOT about to agree to put them in danger for the sake of some (ill-defined) government conspiracy.

Some of the conspiracy theorists on here seem unable to accept a basic truth: not everything in life makes sense. Even the most apparently straight-forward event or dispute can have some aspect that remains unexplained, or a conflict of evidence between witnesses that cannot be resolved. It may be, but usually is not, evidence of wrong-doing, let alone baroque conspiracy.

For example, I fail to see why the fact that any early newspaper article contradicts some piece of official information necessarily means that the official inforamtion is not only wrong but is being propagated with knowing dishonesty. Could be, of course, but that isn't by any means the most likely or obvious explanation.

"By 2010 the Muslim world will control as much as 60% of the world's oil production and, even more importantly, 95% of remaining global oil export capacity."

Somebody asked: 9/11 and 7/7, cui bono?

This war on terrorism is bogus, Michael Meacher MP

"The 9/11 attacks allowed the US to press the "go" button for a strategy in accordance with the PNAC agenda which it would otherwise have been politically impossible to implement."

Something to think about, for those who are intelligent.

"Something to think about, for those who are intelligent."

Intelligent people also respond to questions and are willing to debate rather than just continually post up links.

Key, Kurkum's back!

Kurkum, any chance you could answer my question as to why a TNT bomb would produce the effects seen on the 7/7 bus whereas an acetone peroxide bomb couldn't?

And also my question as to why there are no first-hand reports of this supposed shooting in Canary Wharf? Particularly as, according to you, it occurred within sight of some Reuters journalists?

Eager minds are anxious to know The Truth!!!

And why, if the bombers are innocent, did they make martyrdom videos?

there is no smoke without fire. do some internet research. all is not what it seems!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!