Morning thelibster, thanks for the reply.
Shame about the not rich bit - me neither 
If you live outside of a small village, I wonder if there's no crime simply because there's so few people there to commit crime?!
Although you're not in the middle of nowhere the population must surely be a small fraction of the area I was looking at in London, which has several high rises in it for example.
If you take population into account, would cities actually seem so much more dangerous I wonder? I'd be surprised if someone hasn't done some research on this - it'd be pretty easy to do - all it is is comparing crime rate to population density)
We've just moved out of the city - for many reasons I hasten to add, not specifically to escape crime - but I do like the relative feeling of security we have in a smaller town. I'm now wondering if the difference is actually as stark as we sometimes imagine.
Is there even much difference at all if you account for population I wonder?