Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Michael Gove, to slash £162m of sports funding in English schools

163 replies

legostuckinmyhoover · 21/11/2010 08:58

Just when is he going to stop. This man has absolutely no idea. And, they keep on saying...'we are not cutting schools budgets...honest!'' Hmm

www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/nov/20/michael-gove-schools-sport-funding

OP posts:
daftpunk · 21/11/2010 12:59

Yes it was fictional - but it was also inspirational.
If I was a teacher I'd run my kids around the field for an hour - then take them inside to watch Billy Elliot ....
All done for less than £10

BaroqueAroundTheClock · 21/11/2010 13:00

so - they go and watch Billy Elliot - and then are inspired........then what??

Their parents can't afford ££££'s a term for lessons?

harpsichordcarrier · 21/11/2010 13:02

'If I was a teacher I'd run my kids around the field for an hour - then take them inside to watch Billy Elliot ....
All done for less than £10'

hahahaha that's a JOKE, right?
would you do that every week, every lesson, for all years? or would the upper school get 'Rocky'?

expatinscotland · 21/11/2010 13:03

'If I was a teacher I'd run my kids around the field for an hour - then take them inside to watch Billy Elliot ....
All done for less than £10'

Instead of following the curriculum? I'm sure your headteacher would love that.

harpsichordcarrier · 21/11/2010 13:04

actually, you should suggest that to Michael Gove:
new school curriculum:
mornings - reading
afternoons - writing
Wednesday afternoon - run round for an hour and watch Billy Elliot.
sorted.

Goblinchild · 21/11/2010 13:13

What about maths?
Although I do like this new, basic curriculum. It would be a lot easier to teach, especially if we can eject disruptive and rude children with a boot up the arse.

grannieonabike · 21/11/2010 13:35

So Gove is reducing funding for sports in schools. A few days/hours later, along come the private companies with offers of sponsorship. Up grow a little army of children who are thoroughly inculcated into the corporate ethos, with a life-time's loyalty to MacDonald's or Pepsi. Where have I seen this before? Oh yes - Big Society. Private companies providing our health care, libraries etc. Wonderful how it all hangs together.

That's one thing. Here's another, from Eton website: 'Games are central to the Eton curriculum not just because boys enjoy them, but because they embody many qualities in which the school believes. Learning to win and lose, to lead and be led, to push oneself to and perhaps beyond one's limits, to think as part of a team, to know when to strive for more and when to acknowledge defeat; these are all part of learning to be human.'

If it's good enough for the Etonians in government, why not for the rest of us?

Sport is one thing in my experience that does provide kids with a level playing field (sorry), at least on a physical level, as it's what you can do with your body, rather than your accent that matters.

Most out of school activities involve at least some parental involvement - willingness to transport kids to clubs etc - but sport is something that even the most poorly-parented kids can join in with (there's always a lift available for kids in the team). It's often cheap. It's hugely rewarding, boosts self-esteem, etc etc - could go on for ages.

But also - it educates kids in a healthy way of life. It proves the advantages of physical exercise, gets them addicted to endorphins, keeps them off the streets and away from drugs and booze, at least for a time.

OK, off my high horse now. YOu know all this already.

I hated all sports at school, btw. I just think they're good for other people. Smile

grannieonabike · 21/11/2010 13:39

I once read a PhD thesis on the use of sport in other disciplines, eg maths, science, languages etc. It can be hugely motivating for some kids to do a whole-body physical warm-up. Gets the blood pumping. I'll shut up now.

Eleison · 21/11/2010 13:43

Too right grannie, about private companies sneaking their sorrry selves into school sports. Private companies already have their claws into our schools in a host of ways that require us to fund schooling by means of consumer decisions. I bet you are right that this 'schools Olympics' will encourage private sponsorship. Ithought it was bad enough before, when schools had to encourage kids to eat more crisps so that the school could get extra pennies towards sport equipment.

That is what the Big Society is, really -- it is the Big Private Sector. A reduced state, with reduced support for authentic community action by the authentic third sector, leaving room for the private sector to step in and make a killing.

edam · 21/11/2010 13:44

Successive governments have flogged off school playing fields and local recreation grounds for development. Now this lot have stopped free swimming for children. And they are stopping funding for school sports, while slashing funding for local authorities who run leisure centres and maintain playing fields and playgrounds.

You can't blame parents for any of this. It's central government (and local govt. wrt planning).

edam · 21/11/2010 13:46

Btw, fizzy drinks and processed food manufacturers are already leading the Department of Health's public health work. That's what the big society means - Coke and Macdonalds or their rivals deciding national nutrition policy.

thelastresort · 21/11/2010 13:49

Absolutely agree grannieonabike.

claig · 21/11/2010 13:49

who's blaming parents? I thought we were all in agreement that it's Gordon Brown's fault.

BaroqueAroundTheClock · 21/11/2010 13:51

no claig - it's the parents fault for not working hard enough to be able to afford to provide these things outside of school.........

grannieonabike · 21/11/2010 13:52

Eleison, it breaks my heart to see how authentic community involvement, which has always been a part of school life, with parents giving up their own time to coach other people's kids at sports for free - how all this is so undervalued by the government. And how they have the cheek to undermine this further by hijacking it, putting a huge, global, for-profit company in charge (which I'm sure will happen and is part of their plan) - and then tell us this is local community involvement. Do they really think we are that gullible?

edam · 21/11/2010 13:56

Claig - there have been posts on this thread blaming parents. Don't want to point the finger at any particular poster but have a look back and you'll see.

vixel · 21/11/2010 14:00

Whats wrong with encouraging private investment and involvement in schools, the more resources our schools have the better as far as I'm concerned.

Eleison · 21/11/2010 14:01

Agree strongly, grannie. It is heartbreaking that this Big Society myth is being used so extensively to cover the wholesale erosion of support for community activity. Charities, the Charity commission, the support services for voluntary & community groups are all being cut. The Commission that polices the structure within which the voluntary sector works in partnership with voluntary groups has been culled. The govt seems actively to despise the thirsd sector, the real community groups, and wants to put businesses in their place with a license to profit from what has in the past been a not-for-profit sphere. It really is an example of "if you are going to tell a lie make it a big one."

BaroqueAroundTheClock · 21/11/2010 14:02

vixel - because private investment and involvement generally costs money. State education is supposed to be inclusive - not exclusive to those that can afford to pay for the extras that come into school from private means.

sarah293 · 21/11/2010 14:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

edam · 21/11/2010 14:16

Vixel - because you end up with companies getting millions of pounds worth of publicity and creating 'brand awareness' amongst children who may not be old enough or experienced enough to critique the company and the information they are supplying. Children are supposed to be at school to be educated, not fed propaganda from big (or small) business.

grannieonabike · 21/11/2010 14:19

Eleison, what is also galling is that as people struggle to make the best of this - as human beings do when they are under pressure - whatever successes they achieve will be credited to the government, when if the government had been truly on our side, they would have supported the initiatives that already exist. In other words, they would have let us call the shots, they would have contacted Sports teachers and coaches, asked PTAs how best they could help us. That would have been a lot cheaper than setting a whole new bureaucracy in place. And then they wouldn't have had the justification for making cuts elsewhere.

As it is, I believe they do want to shrink the state - but they are simply handing it over to big business (that most of them own anyway). And of course these big businesses employ us and pay taxes so we are already up to our eyes in colluding with their dastardly plans ...

Eventually, do you think we will just all live and work for one big company? Or has it happened already, while we weren't looking?

grannieonabike · 21/11/2010 14:20

Well put, Edam.

vixel · 21/11/2010 14:28

If a private company puts money into a school like some have put some into academies and this money is used to improve facilities and resources and so the education that the pupils recieve is beeter then I still don't see the negatives.

stoatsrevenge · 21/11/2010 14:28

Having been on the receiving end of some of the sports opportunities, I can only say that I'm gutted by this decision.

Not only did people come in to do the 'normal' sports like football and tennis, the children had access to tri-golf, basketball, hockey, multi-sports, judo and street dance. All of these classes were given by experts.

The funding offered opportunities to children who aren't keen on PE and taught them that 'doing sport' isn't just about kicking football around the field, by broadening their experiences.

Gutted and furious. Angry

Swipe left for the next trending thread