Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Holidays

Use our Travel forum for recommendations on everything from day trips to the best family-friendly holiday destinations.

Villa split between childfree couples and families

358 replies

Adrianne1234 · 02/05/2024 11:08

Trying to organise a long weekend away (2 nights) with a group of friends for autumn and this is the group split:

Family 1: 2 adults & 2 kids
Family 2: 2 adults & 2 kids
Family 3: 2 adults & 1 kid
Family 4: 2 adults
Family 5: 2 adults

We don't seem to agree on how the total price would be split. The house has 6 bedrooms. 3 family rooms (king beds + single beds) with ensuite bathrooms, 2 standard double rooms and 1 room with 2 single beds for "extra space" (6th room is not claimed by anyone but deemed necessary by the parents to have additional space).

2/3 families seem to think the total bill should be split by couple, without considering the kids.
1/3 families and the 2 adults families think that the families should pay more because despite everyone technically occupying 1 room, some rooms are family rooms.

To state the significance of this, if we wanted to find accommodation for 10 adults, the price per couple would be around half the one we are paying to have a place that can accomodate all the kids/has the right sort of family rooms.

If it was to be split by couple, price would be £550 per couple, which seems pretty steep for families without kids (that also end up getting the crappier rooms).

Food bills will be split amongst adults so kids won't pay for that which has been agreed by everyone.

Thoughts?

OP posts:
Shinyandnew1 · 07/05/2024 21:05

Happyhoppy15 · 07/05/2024 20:57

Had a similar situation for years where we just split the cost per couple led mainly by the people with kids. those without kids decided the next year that they would book separate accommodation. Worked out loads cheaper for those without kids and those with kids realised how much had been subsidised for them! Worked out loads better

Did those with kids ever say anything about it?

Packingcubesqueen · 07/05/2024 21:14

I just cannot imagine a situation where some ‘friends’ are expecting their mates to sub their holiday.
The child free people will be potentially getting disturbed early mornings by excited children, maybe having to have dinner earlier or other little accommodations even if they are not directly looking after the children.
Doesn’t sound like a good deal to me.

Bunnycat101 · 07/05/2024 21:32

It honestly sounds like it’ll be shit for the people without kids especially if you already feel you’re overpaying. And the parents should be contributing to the food for their children. My 7yo can eat like a horse. Obviously they shouldn’t be included in any alcohol costs.

Ellie56 · 07/05/2024 21:34

Nope I wouldn't be agreeing to this. Why should the adults without children have to slum it with smaller bedrooms and sharing a bathroom? And at £550? No way.

You need to find two separate properties - one for all the families, and one for the two couples so everyone pays accordingly.

Start as you mean to go on.If you agree to this shitshow of subsidising the families who get the best rooms and en suite facilities, they will expect it for evermore!

Delatron · 07/05/2024 21:37

Sounds like a crap holiday for those without kids. I’d stay in a (child free) hotel if I were them!

portaide · 07/05/2024 21:38

The thing is those with en-suites are still 4 people to a bathroom and most childless couples won't want to share a bathroom with small kids. The whole point of these types of holidays is to be able to spend time together. If you opt for a hotel the parents will be trapped in the room from 7pm onward. There's no sitting round in the evening. Sharing a hotel is pointless pointless if you really want to be together as a group.

Genevieva · 07/05/2024 21:48

When there are disagreements over money this early on, I would abandon the idea. You will end up feeling resentful and it will ruin your friendship. Cabins or hotel rooms in a nice hotel or B&B is a much better idea.

Seagrassbasket · 07/05/2024 21:50

We have this every time we try to go away as a group of friends cos one of the blokes thinks he shouldn’t have to pay for his kids 🙄
I think it should be split between whoever’s in a bed. Babes in travel cots are free

MargaretThursday · 07/05/2024 21:59

6th room is not claimed by anyone but deemed necessary by the parents to have additional space

Bet you anything the parents who have deemed this necessary will suddenly find their dc have fallen in love with this room and are desperate to use it and "of course no one will mind because no one is using it."

VanGoghsDog · 07/05/2024 22:14

Tell one of the families that they can have the standard double, put their kids in the twin, you'll have the king size with en suite - and then see what they think about paying per room.

Doone22 · 07/05/2024 22:20

Split accommodation by rooms not families so any family taking 1.5 rooms or 2 rooms pay more.
Everything else split by headcount. So family of 5 pay the total bill divided by headcount multiplied by 5

Cerealkiller4U · 07/05/2024 22:21

Whenever we go away we always split by per head. So if we had a family of 6. We’d pay 6 for the family.

Survivedtheex13 · 07/05/2024 22:26

Not sure whereabouts you are thinking of, but a quick search with your criteria on Air b n b have good options at a more reasonable cost, maybe that could be an option?

We are a close family with as many couples with a mix of couples & families, harmony is kept by everyone renting separate accommodations but in the same location, usually a National Trust property type with multiple cottages. We can all meet up in a group but also have our own space when needed.

Shinyandnew1 · 07/05/2024 22:27

Doone22 · 07/05/2024 22:20

Split accommodation by rooms not families so any family taking 1.5 rooms or 2 rooms pay more.
Everything else split by headcount. So family of 5 pay the total bill divided by headcount multiplied by 5

That doesn’t help when there are three nice big king size family rooms with en suites and 2 standard doubles though.

Shinyandnew1 · 07/05/2024 22:30

Adrianne1234 · 02/05/2024 15:29

No, not booked, set up a Zoom call over the weekend as we seem to be at an impasse

How did it go, @Adrianne1234 ?

madameparis · 07/05/2024 22:32

How did your video call go @Adrianne1234 ?

Happyhoppy15 · 07/05/2024 22:41

Shinyandnew1 · 07/05/2024 21:05

Did those with kids ever say anything about it?

Yes at first they didn’t think it was fair but then realised that it hadn’t been really fair for those without kids either. No one fell out and tbh wish we did it earlier!

Doodahday88 · 08/05/2024 00:01

This seems hard to work out really as obviously depends how much bigger/better the family rooms are. I think 50% more is probably fair. We’ve always had two rooms- one for us and one for the kids and paid per room (so we would pay more than a couple).

TwelveTimesTables · 08/05/2024 00:10

That sounds fantastically complicated. What happens when they all need the spare room at 3am?

I think going to butlins or center parcs might be better so they all have separate housing and can choose and pay their own bills.

potato57 · 08/05/2024 00:10

As a child-free adult, I'd already be annoyed at having to contribute towards food for 5 kids, there's no way I'd be paying for part of their (better) rooms too. But I'd never share a villa with kids, sounds like hell.

SluggyMuggy · 08/05/2024 00:38

portaide · 07/05/2024 21:38

The thing is those with en-suites are still 4 people to a bathroom and most childless couples won't want to share a bathroom with small kids. The whole point of these types of holidays is to be able to spend time together. If you opt for a hotel the parents will be trapped in the room from 7pm onward. There's no sitting round in the evening. Sharing a hotel is pointless pointless if you really want to be together as a group.

Very different sharing a bathroom with your own family, than sharing it with another family.
And why would couples not want to share a bathroom with someone else's kids?
Sharing a hotel gets suggested because some parents do not understand about fairness. You seem to be one of them as you think a family with two children sharing an en suite bathroom is the same as two adult couples sharing a bathroom.

SpeedwellBlue · 08/05/2024 03:09

Happyhoppy15 · 07/05/2024 20:57

Had a similar situation for years where we just split the cost per couple led mainly by the people with kids. those without kids decided the next year that they would book separate accommodation. Worked out loads cheaper for those without kids and those with kids realised how much had been subsidised for them! Worked out loads better

So much more peaceful for them too. Other people's kids can be annoying.

Happyhoppy15 · 08/05/2024 03:49

SpeedwellBlue · 08/05/2024 03:09

So much more peaceful for them too. Other people's kids can be annoying.

Agree, and tiring.

TiaKofi · 08/05/2024 05:42

The 2/3 couples essentially want your child free friends to subsidise their kids. Not on. How entitled. Pay for your own kids. Your friend are already having to put up with them.

Nanaof1 · 08/05/2024 05:52

Adrianne1234 · 02/05/2024 19:33

Didn't expect this to be so one sided, feel better about not being the unreasonable ones as I had to started to doubt myself

Edited

I hope you have also decided to not pay for the children's food. By the times they buy all the "treats" and child specific foods, you will find it quite expensive. The only other way that would be even slightly fair would be the parent's of the kids buy all their treats and snacks and child specific foods on their own and you all split the rest of the costs.