Some years ago, DD was pooled but rejected from C. Her close-second choice was LSE which turned out to be an utter nightmare. They extended the deadline people would hear by three times! In the end, they kept her hanging until 6pm on the very last possible day in May before the rejection email pinged through. By then, they had had her application since late Sept - so 8 months!
She was fortunate that she did receive offers at Bristol, UCL and Durham. UCL snd Bristol had come in before Xmas. I think Durham came in about March. Anyway, she decided against Bristol because of the course being slightly different there. UCL can be a nightmare for accommodation as you don't know what you're getting until the last minute. Durham is beautiful but very far north for us and also quite small and she was worried about the then 'rah' reputation ( I think this is not so much the case now). I think, the process was so drawn out that she got in quite a low mindset and couldn't get excited about any of her actual offers.
In the end, she took the risk and reapplied to C and was successful. But she also was very excited about gap year plans and she spent most of the year working in a community project in a developing country. She also applied to a few US options in the gap year to broaden the search.
Now she is at C and honestly, the workload is fine. She says some people just like to exaggerate it to make themselves sound special. Yes, they do about 7 essays per term but, as she says, so what really? It's not as if they have anything else to do and they are in fully catered colleges with their beds changed for them etc and the term is only 8 weeks. Also, these essays are just a starting point for discussion in supervisions - they are not really graded and don't go towards final marks.
There are some international students who hardly ever come out of their rooms and are in the library until 3am and this kind of thing, but that's up to them. There is actually no need for any of that.
Now that she is at C, she can see that it is quite a lot of hype to a certain degree and that obviously people there are no different to people at other unis with the same grade requirements. It's very arbitrary as to who gets in and who doesn't.
She reckons anyone who can get a combo of A stars and maybe the odd A at A-level could easily cope there. There is no such thing as an 'Oxbridge type.' Tutors can only make an informed guesstimate on the info they have.
Having said this, the admissions system is even more ridiculous at LSE where the whole decision rests on the PS (they all have top grades). Surely they realise some students have a lot more help with the PS than others?
Reapplying is not for everyone, but if they do decide to go that route, make sure they have a clear plan for the gap year and also maybe broaden the uni search?