So DS got his Cambridge feedback. He was correct in thinking his interviews had gone well.
They said they take all aspects of the application into account including the history assessment, GCSE grades, Predictions and Reference
DS said his reference was good
GCSE grades: 999999998AstarAstar
AL predictions 3x A star (History, Economics, Music), A (Maths)
The only unknown is the at interview assessment. DS was confident when writing it and I will trust his judgement as his judgement of his work has usually been on track. The score was not given for this and DS forgot to ask at the interview when asked if he had any questions for them.
They concluded " chopcDC will clearly make a good undergraduate student in History"
In the last paragraph: As is always the case, we have had to reject hundreds of very talented applicants. A rejection in no way indicates a lack of potential; rather, that they were not as strong as those who led this year's field. We have no doubt that chopcDC will have a very successful undergraduate career
DH thinks as expected feedback was useless. I think it was good to know that there wasn't more DS could have done.
DS thinks his chances may have been better if he was able to do a backflip! (He has wanted to try over the past couple of years but I have said not to due to being too old to start trying and for the fear of injury - maybe I will give in after his AL).
Not sure how I feel TBH. Need time to process