I wouldn't wish my previous post to be misunderstood or misinterpreted.
However, info sources available make it clear that applying tactically is important for applicants to maximise their chances of getting a place to study medicine at Uni, with the first hurdle being obtaining an interview. School UCAS advisers across DD's MAT also reiterated this to the aspiring medics and their parents/carers. GCSE grades/UCAT and BMAT scores/ predicted A Level or equivalent grades/personal statement/reference/work experience can carry differing weightings at the various Universities. It would be disingenuous not to acknowledge that candidates with average/below average UCAT/BMAT and/or a more mixed bag of GCSE grades or not predicted A*/A at A Level have generally applied for a different range of Universities and that this has previously proved a successful strategy for maximising candidates chances of heading off to study medicine on first application.
DD's currently acknowledged weakness, by comparison to her aspiring medic peers, is interviews. However, it has been indicated that the interviews are scored and form part of an overall decision making index. If, because her UCAT/BMAT, GCSEs and predicted grades were at the top end of the pool of fellow interviewees for a particular Uni, then even with a weaker interview score she might stand more chance of ranking above the cut off point as far as securing an offer is concerned, based on the relative scoring of her academic achievement/aptitude test results (assuming she doesn't present as an extreme introvert, sociopath or similar at interview).
I haven't a clue where any doctor whom my family have ever been treated by would have trained, nor would I care. Once qualified and practicing, being held in any esteem professionally would surely come down to reputation/results/published research. They need to put in the graft to create their own "gilded" career.