I just think that, in the absence of exams, it was inevitable really that allowances were going to have to be made for the current year 13s and they were always going to have to be given the benefit of the doubt in the end. It’s just a shame it took GW et al until the 13th hour to realise this!
It’s an imperfect system in any year anyway, with some outstanding candidates inevitably falling through the net. Even the student predicted AAAA with prizes in x,y,z can have an iffy interview or nerves can take over in an exam. The whole selection process is a bit of a dark art, even in the best of years. Getting the place is one thing, what they do with it is another, and it’s impossible to say how it will pan out for any of them. They’re young and they have a long way to go. This is just a point in time.
But I will say that I did see this situation coming. No, I didn’t quite foresee things being as dramatic as 40% grade inflation with no exams. But as soon as Cambridge announced they would guarantee deferrals for anyone upping grades via the Autumn exams, I thought... hmm, here we go...
Personally I don’t begrudge any student a place anywhere this year as it’s been a bloody shambles and they’ve had no chance to prove themselves, which must be very frustrating indeed. What a mess. I would be livid if my DC was moderated down, only to then receive their CAGs a few days later and find out their first choice course was now full. And the poor BTEC students still haven’t got their grades. Outrageous.
The reason I am annoyed is because these things are avoidable with a bit of foresight. Eg. if they have 50 extra students this year for a course that can only admit 150, then maybe half will need to defer (or something like that), but what would be helpful is if they could issue a statement that this will not mean x% less places for 2021 because the whole thing is stressful enough without feeling that the odds are even more stacked against you than ever because the govt are a bunch of dipsticks, frankly.