Kristina, I can't believe that after all those months of hard work to get to the point of getting an interview, a pupil would risk messing it all up by dressing totally inappropriately. What did her parents think, although I accept some parents wouldn't have a clue. Then again, maybe that's how she felt comfortable and confident and if that showed at her interview, maybe it wouldn't have prejudiced her
I fear it was just a misjudgememt and suspect her parents didn’t know any better. I’m giessing she thought “ smart “ meant “ dressed up in your best going out clothes “ rather than what we understand means “office appropriate “.
Poor girl must have felt very out of place surrounded by other kids in more traditional interview outfits. You need a lot of confidence to stand out from the crowd for that reason in that setting.
I suspect some schools don’t help with all this “ just be yourself “ lark. They are 17 or 18, half of them don’t have any sense at all. They don’t know that “ be yourself” means “ look like a potential medical student “ not “ show your knickers to the interviewers every time you cross your legs “.
Most of the kids I saw going for interview wore smart / causal office wear. Boys had smart trousers , open neck shirt with neat jumper or smart trousers with collar and tie and casual jacket or a suit and tie.
Girls had smart dress and cardigan or jacket, or smart trousers with office type blouse . I didnt see any girls in skirt suits, I don’t think they are in fashion right now .
Of course in theory it doesn’t matter what they wear. But DD would have felt even more nervous in the “ wrong “ clothes. She may be a scruff bag but she’s a conventional scruff bag.