My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

Guest posts

Guest post: "How we learn to eat"

237 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 14/01/2016 12:12

Is any meal as hotly anticipated as a baby's first bite of solid food? As parents, we anxiously research our options. Baby rice versus sweet potato. Purée versus baby-led weaning. Offering the first morsel, we stare at the tiny face for signs of enjoyment. Will we get a smile or will it – the trauma! – be rejected?

So desperate are we to make our babies happy, we haven't noticed that we have got feeding the wrong way round. We try to give our children what they like, when really we should be trying to help them develop their palates so they relish a wider range of flavours.

Newborns the world over beam at the taste of sweetness and treat bitter foods like poison. If you only give them the foods that automatically make them smile, you are setting them up for a sweet tooth.

I definitely made this mistake with my daughter, our middle child. I bought a weaning guide and spent hours whipping up batches of vegetable mixtures. Every time she tasted one, I drew an emoticon next to it in the book. Butternut squash: smile. Broccoli: frown. Spinach: double frown. Ah, I thought, so she's not a green vegetable person.

What I did not fully realise then was that we are not born with our preferences. They are something we each have to learn for ourselves. When my daughter grimaced at a bite of spinach, she was not telling me that greens sucked. It was just a natural physiological response. As adults, we still pucker our mouths on tasting a slice of bitter lime, but it doesn't necessarily mean we hate citrus fruit.

If we want our children to eat a varied diet, we need to persist with offering them a spectrum of flavours – preferably without grimacing ourselves. The main way anyone learns to like anything is simply to try it a lot of times, in a positive way.

According to a government survey from 2010, 57% of British parents offer baby rice – with its bland, sweet flavour - as the first food. But a fascinating study published last year, involving 139 families, showed that babies weaned straight onto a varied vegetable diet in those early months are more adventurous.

One group of parents gave their babies a smorgasbord of different vegetables for two weeks. 'Day 1: Carrot. Day 2: Spinach. Day 3: Peas. Day 4: Swede', and so on. A control group were weaned onto the usual baby rice. On Day 15, both groups of babies were offered a taste of unfamiliar artichoke purée. The babies weaned onto a rainbow of vegetables ate significantly more of the artichoke.

The science suggests that any baby is capable of learning wide enough tastes to eat a balanced and healthy diet. The good news is that no one is doomed by their genes to be a chocoholic.

I'm not saying every child will find it easy. When you are trapped in teatime battles, it's annoying to encounter smug parents whose children will 'try anything – celeriac's her favourite!' Some babies are born with conditions that make eating trickier, such as a delay to the oral-motor system. I had no idea how fraught the basic matter of getting food from plate to mouth could be until my third child was born with cleft palate and he and I both struggled at mealtimes. He is now six and new dishes occasionally still provoke tears (usually his).

But recent work by feeding psychologists has shown it is possible for even extremely selective eaters to slowly broaden horizons. The secret is what Dr Lucy Cooke – a psychologist who works at Great Ormond Street – calls 'Tiny Tastes'. If the piece of food being attempted is as small as a pea or even a grain of rice, it is much less traumatic for a child to taste it. At clinics in America, this method has been tailored to fussy eaters on the autistic spectrum. In one case, a toddler called Jim went from eating nothing but toasted cheese sandwiches and hotdogs to enjoying 65 different foods. This is life-changing.

'Tiny Tastes' can also work with less extreme fussy eaters. Dr Cooke – who has trialled the method in UK schools and homes – finds it works best if the tasting sessions are done outside mealtimes, to reduce the pressure. The child chooses the vegetable to work on, which makes them feel less trapped. And they get a sticker for every taste – even a lick. I used 'Tiny Tastes' on my own youngest when he was four and was startled by how quickly it turned him from someone who said 'yuck' when he heard the word cabbage to a happy nibbler of raw green leaves.

Ultimately, that first meal matters less than all the ones that come after. Given the chance, children are capable of learning new tastes at any age. Even as adults, we can change our palates, bit by bit.

Oh, and my daughter? She's now 13 - and it turns out she is a green vegetable person after all.

NOTE: Following discussion on the thread below, the title of this guest post has been updated to better reflect the author's intentions.

Bee Wilson is the author of First Bite: How we Learn to Eat.

OP posts:
Report
Flingingmelon · 14/01/2016 20:45

Ooh ooh Bingo! It's the fault of the FF mothers! Full house!

What do I win?

Biscuit

Report
HairsprayQueen · 14/01/2016 20:46

mrscripps it was my bf child that was the fussy one, the ff one was fine Hmm

Report
TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 14/01/2016 20:48

My least fussy child is the only one of my 3 to have had much formula.

Report
hazeyjane · 14/01/2016 20:50

I think its down to FF< awaits flaming>

Oh don't be a doofus.

Report
MrsCripps · 14/01/2016 20:51

Oh do stop with all the bingo twattery!
It actually makes sense.
I grew up in the 70s - fussy eating didn't exist.
We were all BF.< hippies>

Babies don't just go from milk to food with no connection.
If you feed your baby one flavour for 6 months of their life its not a big jump that this might cause problems later on.

Report
sugar21 · 14/01/2016 20:52

mrs cripps I bf my baby and gave her lots of different foods but that didn't stop her getting ill

Report
FaFoutis · 14/01/2016 20:54

It does sound logical MrsC, but it isn't true.

The reason fussy eating didn't exist in the 70s was a; nobody was writing stupid books about it, and b; everybody just ate egg and chips.

Report
PolterGoose · 14/01/2016 20:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Joskar · 14/01/2016 20:54

mrscripps you know that you're going to get flamed because on some level you must realise that what you posted was wrong. You must know it isn't that simple. You cannot be so black and white.

Bf dd is extremely fussy. Ff me never been fussy.

Report
merrymouse · 14/01/2016 20:54

rubbish mrs cripps. My fussiest child was breast fed the longest (over a year) and we did the whole baby led weaning malarkey.

Report
MrsCripps · 14/01/2016 20:55

Im sorry your baby was ill.
Im not saying babies will be ill as he result off FF either.

Report
hazeyjane · 14/01/2016 20:55

I grew up in the 70s - fussy eating didn't exist.

This just isn't true - ok maybe I was the only breastfed fussy eater in the 70s, but I doubt it.

You are putting everything down to taste - what about texture (a big issue with a lot of people with food issues), or have you a theory about breast nipple texture versus bottle teat texture??

If you do, I'd love to hear it, I bet its a doosie.

Report
sugar21 · 14/01/2016 20:56

My baby is dead

Report
TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 14/01/2016 20:56

My brother was hugely fussy in the 70s. He grew out of it though (and he was breastfed as it happens...)

Report
merrymouse · 14/01/2016 20:57

I grew up in the 70s - fussy eating didn't exist.
We were all BF.< hippies>

Again rubbish. I grew up in the seventies. Formula feeding was the norm.

Report
InTheTeapot · 14/01/2016 20:57

Three children. All fed a mixture of BF and FF. 1st is fussy, getting better, 2nd is adventurous and 3rd is the most fussy.
How does that fit your theory mrscripps?

Report
MrsCripps · 14/01/2016 20:58

I don't think Im wrong .

Just because it makes you uncomfortable doesn't mean Im wrong.
It makes perfect sense.

Report
InTheTeapot · 14/01/2016 21:00

I'm not uncomfortable at all and you are wrong.

Report
hazeyjane · 14/01/2016 21:01

it doesn't make perfect sense - and as I say, only relates to taste anyway which isn't the issue in many cases.

Report
usual · 14/01/2016 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

eatingworms · 14/01/2016 21:03

I was one of the fussiest eaters you could meet as a child. I now eat virtually anything, love my food and importantly, love healthy food, lots of fruit and vegetables, with a passion. So it really didn't matter.

My kids are both long term breastfed and weaned on a good variety of things. DS is a pretty good eater, DD has a very sweet tooth and is shaping up to be a total nightmare.

Report
MrsCripps · 14/01/2016 21:04

Nope Im not wrong.
You have fussy eaters and there are children starving to death on the other side of the world.
This is a "created" problem Hmm

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

merrymouse · 14/01/2016 21:04

Why would feel uncomfortable about formula feeding mrscripps? Most of us have told you that what you say is rubbish because we breast fed our children.

Report
usual · 14/01/2016 21:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ByThePrickingOfMyThumbs · 14/01/2016 21:06

But MrsCripps lots of posters - including me- have said that their DCs ate well as babies, but then became fussy as toddlers. How does that fit with your pet theory about FFing?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.