Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why I wear the niqab

669 replies

MumsnetGuestBlogs · 16/10/2013 10:58

The common impression that people have about women who wear the niqab is that they are forced to do so by their spouses or society, and are therefore oppressed. They are also believed to be uneducated, passive - kept behind closed doors, and not integrated within British society.

These negative prejudices are just that, though they are presented as facts - widely accepted, and promoted by cynical politicians every so often. Although I prefer not to be apologetic in my approach, I always find myself having to explain my choice to wear the niqab, in the hope that I can raise awareness, challenge misperceptions and help promote mutual respect.

To understand the niqab, it helps to understand the religion behind it. Islam has three simple messages – liberation from worshipping anything but the one God; following in the way of His Prophets including Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, peace be upon them; and servitude to the whole of humanity. Islam’s practical acts of liberation are many – from the duty of environmentalism (protecting ‘the Creation’ from the excesses of humankind) to the imperative of modesty for both women and men – one part of which is the face-veil.

In my view, the authentic reading of Scripture does not deem the niqab as compulsory, but rather as highly recommended: the wives of the prophet Muhammad used to wear it, and they are my role models.

Therefore the niqab is a religious symbol - and wearing it is considered by many Muslim women as an act of worship. Certainly the niqab is a spiritual journey that not many will take or understand, but those women who choose to wear it, such as myself, believe that it brings them closer to God, their Creator.

I also find the niqab liberating and dignifying; it gives me a sense of strength and empowers me. Deciding to wear it wasn’t easy - I had to go against my wishes of my parents, who discouraged me from wearing it because they feared I would face discrimination. But since I started wearing it, over 10 years ago, I have never changed my decision, nor have I ever found it a barrier. I continued my education to postgraduate level, and am now a professional molecular geneticist. Never once did I feel that the niqab prevented me from adding value to our British society – I’m involved in many community projects and events, and hold leadership positions in community organisations.

Some claim that women choose to wear the niqab do so due to social constraints and conditioning. This might be applicable to some extent in countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran, where individuals have to behave in a certain way for social approval (which can include wearing the face-veil). But in Britain, face-veiled women are minority within a minority – numbering perhaps just 0.001% of the total Muslim population in the UK (no statistics are available on this issue). Wearing the niqab is not so common within the British Muslim community that social conditioning could play any significant role: in Britain the majority of these women wear the niqab as a personal choice.

The norms of any society are the sum of its collective values, so rather than talking about the role of social conditioning in relation to face-veiled women, let’s talk about those norms. Public freedom is a cherished value in the UK, and is part of the fabric of our society. It allows individuals the right to practice and articulate their religious freedoms and rights – and offers a woman total freedom of choice to decide what she wears. Women who wear the niqab are simply articulating those religious and personal freedoms – and we cannot risk undermining them for the sake of social imaginaries, deep-seated psychological fears, or ignorance.

There are claims that the niqab is a 'security threat', but such claims are overblown. With regards to the issue of security, particularly the wearing of the niqab in court, let’s be clear that Muslim women are allowed to take off their veils, particularly in the pursuit of justice. But there’s no common approach and each case should be dealt with individually, in a manner that ensures the preservation of these women’s dignity and rights. These women are not committing any crime; they must be treated as human beings with full rights to participate equally in civil society, and to access education.

The reason, I believe, that the niqab debate has progressed this far is that there exists a wide range of far-right movements, politicians and intellectuals across the spectrum who seek to promote the hysteria that fuels anti-Muslim hatred. These people hope to make the face-veiled Muslim women emblematic of a sinister 'Other', a ‘problem’ impossible to solve or accept.

We have to overcome this authoritarian mentality which assumes a right to interfere in the lives, appearances and thoughts of other people. We all have so much to offer each other and we should extend our tolerance to respect, not merely for individuals, but for their beliefs as well. Otherwise, by all clamouring to enforce our own ideologies on the women we seek to “liberate”, we will be contributing to their collective oppression. Indeed, attempts to ban the niqab will marginalise face-veiled women from participating in public life.

It’s time to go beyond words, and to pursue peace, prosperity and freedom through social, political and interfaith harmony - seeking compassionate justice for everyone, and protecting freedom of the individual.

OP posts:
GoshAnneGorilla · 20/10/2013 14:02

I think that the fact that a practice such as wearing niqab cannot be discussed without it being turned into a big rant against Muslims and Islam and terrorism - a rant which is completely devoid of political, historical or socioeconomic considerations, show why Muslims might feel somewhat defensive.

Note that Northern Ireland (rightly) was described as being not just about religion, but no such nuance is accepted when it comes to discussing issues in the Muslim world.

Orientalism anyone? Or colonial mindsets?

Swallowed - I don't care where you've lived, your attempts to lecture Muslim women on their own religion, as if we are in need of your insight are obnoxious beyond belief.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:07

which rant is that? and who recently has ranted against muslims?

i'm sorry you find me critiquing and discussing religion obnoxious. i find avoiding discussion by shouting 'islamophobia' pretty obnoxious personally.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 14:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

alemci · 20/10/2013 14:09

hi Swallowed did you mean being a christian is like devil worship? If so why?

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:11

this is a free world - a multicultural world, a world of plural religions and non religion, a world of free speech. i have not been anti-muslim. i will not apologise for commenting on the religion or talking about my understanding and study of it - or pointing out things i learnt in my reading of the koran and lessons from a very learned scholar. why should i?

it is odd that you think only muslims should be allowed to talk about islam. pointing out that forced marriage is against islam is offensive to you? or that the veil is not a requirement of islam and not equivalent to extra prayers given the interior logic of the korans teachings about fasting privately? which bit is obnoxious of me to point out?

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:14

i mean all of it can be seen as equivalent - any religion that says that god is a being who would want to see people stoned to death for transgressions, and would want 'his/her children' to partake in murder is worshipping someone/something that sounds more devil-like than god-like to me.

if there is a god he/she does not want to see people murdered for who they are and does not want people to murder others. it seems like kind of a really basic qualification for being 'god'. imho.

Gauri · 20/10/2013 14:16

I think all my south asian relatives will despute that muslims have a peaceful history.

Hmm Hmm

alemci · 20/10/2013 14:16

Great points Crescent however I would say that christianity began to lose its grip earlier than the 20th century as people began to move away from the state church, the Quakers, Methodism - Charles Wesley, the Baptist movement.

I think that Islam does need to go through reformation in the way that christianity did in the 16th century with Martin Luther etc.

Disraeli was Jewish I think and he was prime minister in the 19th century

GoshAnneGorilla · 20/10/2013 14:24

Swallowed - lecturing people about things they already know and indeed know far more about then you , is both obnoxious and tedious. Ditto your wider thoughts on God, which is irrelevant to the OP.

Accusing people of "shouting Islamophobia" is as lowly as people accusing others of "playing the race card", but I don't expect you to understand such dynamics.

Gauri · 20/10/2013 14:25

christianity also had your henry the eights to help it along, rightly or wrongly.

people are forgetting the crusades. islam has been spread across the globe by the sword. unlike Buddhism, which is truely aboit peace.

Gauri · 20/10/2013 14:27

i have enjoyed the well written objective posts by cresent and swallow.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 14:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 14:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GoshAnneGorilla · 20/10/2013 14:35

Gauri - the Rohyinga in Myanmar might disagree with that statement, as would the Tamils of Sri Lanka. Indeed many of the Buddhist- majority countries experienced conflict and unrest in the 20th century and beyond.

The idea that certain peoples are inherently violent is extremely dubious and harmful. Conflicts arise due to a multitude of factors, regardless of who is involved.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:35

on what basis do you assume they know better? purely by being a muslim? you think every muslim has read the koran, studied their religion with a good teacher, etc? h'ok. i thought it was dangerous to leave the false idea that the koran doesn't ban forced marriage unchallenged on here - i'm sorry that offended you.

and no it isn't equivalent, that's obvious. but hey ho with the drama lama'ing. and i do understand such dynamics - it's quite within my field.

Gauri · 20/10/2013 14:37

Crescent, your statement is like saying the British were better colonists than the Spanish or the Dutch or the Portuguese. Ask the oppressed. Ask the Hindus or the natives how they felt say in Indonesia on the spread of Islam.

itsthawooluff · 20/10/2013 14:38

To be honest I have the same issue with this as I do with Christian sects, or Orthodox Jews who require certain dress from their womenfolk,e.g. Plymouth Bretheren.

If a person believes that a good, a righteous, woman, is expected to behave or dress in a certain way, then it is difficult to see how they would view anyone who doesn't dress or behave in that way in any other way than somehow less good, less righteous.

I can see the appeal, the empowerment, of not being judged purely on your facial appearance, but find the idea that men's beards are equal in ensuring their modesty a very specious argument.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 14:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:38

in case it wasn't obvious what i meant: there is a difference between islamophobia and disagreeing with a muslim individual.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:40

or disagreeing with a person who happens to not be of the same ethnic background to yourself doesn't equate to racism.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:41

the men's beard bit was a red herring anyway - it's not a requirement for muslims to grow beards and it seems to be more of a national heritage thing than a religious thing. i knew very, very few egyptian men who grew beards or thought facial hair had anything to do with faith.

Gauri · 20/10/2013 14:43

Again, I really do doubt of most of African converted to Islam as a choice. The slave trade at the time which was mainly run by Arab Muslim and Christians may have something to the conversions of Africans.

Gauri · 20/10/2013 14:46

The notion that islams is the only god and the only true god causes a lot of problems.

It stops confusion as in Hinduism but essentially the thought that everyone who is not of the faith is kafir is also ingrained in Islam.

TheDietStartsTomorrow · 20/10/2013 14:51

I've read the article but I haven't read the rest of the thread yet but just want to comment on this quote:
islam and christianity both spread by the sword, but the swords were pointed in different directions. for islam in its early period, for christianity in its later period.

Early Islam was not spread by the sword. Islam is not a religion of compulsion and the Quran mentions this explicitly saying 'There is no compulsion in religion' [chapter 2, verse 256]. The verse explains that the message of Islam has become clear and those who wish to follow may follow and those who don't make this choice for themselves. For this reason, the early Muslims and those who followed them did not spread Islam by force or by the sword. They conquered lands, but that is different from compelling subjects to become Muslims.

In fact, the residents of conquered lands had a choice and if they chose not to become Muslim, this was accepted. They were free to continue living in their lands as Christians, Idolators, Zorastrians etc. and pay a tax called 'jizya' which afforded them Muslim protection and defence against other nations. The early Muslims even facilitated the building of their temples and churches.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 14:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.