Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why I wear the niqab

669 replies

MumsnetGuestBlogs · 16/10/2013 10:58

The common impression that people have about women who wear the niqab is that they are forced to do so by their spouses or society, and are therefore oppressed. They are also believed to be uneducated, passive - kept behind closed doors, and not integrated within British society.

These negative prejudices are just that, though they are presented as facts - widely accepted, and promoted by cynical politicians every so often. Although I prefer not to be apologetic in my approach, I always find myself having to explain my choice to wear the niqab, in the hope that I can raise awareness, challenge misperceptions and help promote mutual respect.

To understand the niqab, it helps to understand the religion behind it. Islam has three simple messages – liberation from worshipping anything but the one God; following in the way of His Prophets including Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, peace be upon them; and servitude to the whole of humanity. Islam’s practical acts of liberation are many – from the duty of environmentalism (protecting ‘the Creation’ from the excesses of humankind) to the imperative of modesty for both women and men – one part of which is the face-veil.

In my view, the authentic reading of Scripture does not deem the niqab as compulsory, but rather as highly recommended: the wives of the prophet Muhammad used to wear it, and they are my role models.

Therefore the niqab is a religious symbol - and wearing it is considered by many Muslim women as an act of worship. Certainly the niqab is a spiritual journey that not many will take or understand, but those women who choose to wear it, such as myself, believe that it brings them closer to God, their Creator.

I also find the niqab liberating and dignifying; it gives me a sense of strength and empowers me. Deciding to wear it wasn’t easy - I had to go against my wishes of my parents, who discouraged me from wearing it because they feared I would face discrimination. But since I started wearing it, over 10 years ago, I have never changed my decision, nor have I ever found it a barrier. I continued my education to postgraduate level, and am now a professional molecular geneticist. Never once did I feel that the niqab prevented me from adding value to our British society – I’m involved in many community projects and events, and hold leadership positions in community organisations.

Some claim that women choose to wear the niqab do so due to social constraints and conditioning. This might be applicable to some extent in countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran, where individuals have to behave in a certain way for social approval (which can include wearing the face-veil). But in Britain, face-veiled women are minority within a minority – numbering perhaps just 0.001% of the total Muslim population in the UK (no statistics are available on this issue). Wearing the niqab is not so common within the British Muslim community that social conditioning could play any significant role: in Britain the majority of these women wear the niqab as a personal choice.

The norms of any society are the sum of its collective values, so rather than talking about the role of social conditioning in relation to face-veiled women, let’s talk about those norms. Public freedom is a cherished value in the UK, and is part of the fabric of our society. It allows individuals the right to practice and articulate their religious freedoms and rights – and offers a woman total freedom of choice to decide what she wears. Women who wear the niqab are simply articulating those religious and personal freedoms – and we cannot risk undermining them for the sake of social imaginaries, deep-seated psychological fears, or ignorance.

There are claims that the niqab is a 'security threat', but such claims are overblown. With regards to the issue of security, particularly the wearing of the niqab in court, let’s be clear that Muslim women are allowed to take off their veils, particularly in the pursuit of justice. But there’s no common approach and each case should be dealt with individually, in a manner that ensures the preservation of these women’s dignity and rights. These women are not committing any crime; they must be treated as human beings with full rights to participate equally in civil society, and to access education.

The reason, I believe, that the niqab debate has progressed this far is that there exists a wide range of far-right movements, politicians and intellectuals across the spectrum who seek to promote the hysteria that fuels anti-Muslim hatred. These people hope to make the face-veiled Muslim women emblematic of a sinister 'Other', a ‘problem’ impossible to solve or accept.

We have to overcome this authoritarian mentality which assumes a right to interfere in the lives, appearances and thoughts of other people. We all have so much to offer each other and we should extend our tolerance to respect, not merely for individuals, but for their beliefs as well. Otherwise, by all clamouring to enforce our own ideologies on the women we seek to “liberate”, we will be contributing to their collective oppression. Indeed, attempts to ban the niqab will marginalise face-veiled women from participating in public life.

It’s time to go beyond words, and to pursue peace, prosperity and freedom through social, political and interfaith harmony - seeking compassionate justice for everyone, and protecting freedom of the individual.

OP posts:
crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 12:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

UptheChimney · 20/10/2013 12:44

No-one's answered my question about Islamic views on women as religious leaders. Are there any female Imams?

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 20/10/2013 12:44

Yes, they should, crescentmoon. I deliberately worded my post to make it clear that I was talking about all faiths, not just Islam. I think every faith has the responsibility to speak out against evil done in their names.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 12:49

agreed SDTG and i agree your post very clearly wasn't worded as an accusation or an attack on muslims so i'm not sure why the defensive/attacking business in response.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 12:52

i personally think it's time to go properly secular and stop all the special treatment for religions re: exemptions that allow them to lawfully discriminate against protected characteristics.

religion as a personal matter is fine but it's time to ditch society having to treat it as a hallowed ground imo. believe what you want to believe, don't be discriminated against for having beliefs but no more with the cotton gloves and pandering to practices against human rights and the law of the land. hell even mohammed told people to obey the laws of the land they are in - as did jesus.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 12:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

alemci · 20/10/2013 12:59

but look what happens when the Muslim Leaders do speak out against the terrorism. The guys in GB now have death threats and police guards for daring to criticise the assasins in the Kenyan shopping centre.

I don't like this at all and it scares me that people who think like this are amongst us here.

I think with the IRA and other atrocities carried out by christians, I don't think they are practicing their faith otherwise they would not do this. They are born into the faith i.e. their parents are Irish Catholic so they are catholic and they support the Irish cause. Some christians do support a just war but only in defence and to free people from opression. e.g. World War 2 against Hitler. The UK did try to negotiate and appease.

Also I think UK has been secular to an extent for the 200 years' and religion isn't tied up in the state in quite the same way

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 20/10/2013 13:02

Yes, crescentmoon, wherever evil is done in the name of a faith, religion, ideology, belief system or whatever, we should speak out against it.

What, from what I actually wrote, makes you think I would believe anything other than this?

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:21

we're not secular here and we still give massive privileges to religion in law.

the northern ireland issue was a localised one based on conflict over colonisation essentially. islamic terrorism is rather different - being international and in the minds of many involved in it about intolerance of literally everyone expect those who live by their religion and law. it isn't about wanting to get one's land back but to colonise lands actually. it's very different.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:26

except not expect Confused

islamic terrorism just doesn't compare to that of northern island which actually was not about religion but what one group saw as the illegal colonisation of it's land and it's culture by an incoming group and religion offered privilege over that of the native people. they were divided religiously because of their heritage backgrounds - british, protestant/irish, catholic. it wasn't about religion or a war between religions but one between those who wanted n.i. to stay british and those who wanted to join the republic. religion was coincidental as such.

for islam it is truly about religion, albeit 'their' interpretation of their religion and there does seem to be something about islam, or perhaps the areas it orginated from, that lends itself to being interpreted in brutal ways that are intolerant of other perspectives, modern laws, heterogenorous societies etc.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 13:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:28

again showing hadith is written in the context of power relations, historical and cultural context, etc.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:30

i mean what part of the message that the koran was the final and perfect word of god did people not grasp?

believe me i level equal criticism at the way christians have ignored and misinterpreted and gone again the essential teachings of jesus.

religion can't seem to help itself.

believing in god and wisdom and truth is one thing - religion is another entirely sadly because it always turns into worldly shite.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:32

by which i mean from what i have studied and experienced there is great, beautiful, just truths at the heart of religions but without fail they are twisted and turned into ugly, power orientated, divisive, tribal systems. and then the followers commit what i believe is the true blasphemy of worshipping their religion above allah, god, brahma, etc.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:35

any religion that asserts that women are beneath men - whether they assert it brutally or with nice flowery words about how none the less the man should consult the woman or we are equally valuable but men have the greater capacity for x, y or z that basically means power CANNOT be from anywhere/anyone worthy of the word or concept of 'god'. i don't get how any person with any true sense or spirituality or belief in the concept of an all intelligent, benevolent, all knowing god can buy into and defend or go into nonsense apologetics for the blasphemy the religions commit in making god in man's image.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 13:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:42

there is a passage in the gospel, cba to go looking for a reference, where jesus comes back and the religious idiots are the first to hit the dust and they are horrified, 'but we called out in demons in your name' etc and he just says, 'i never knew you'.

it's one of my favourite parts Grin because it makes SUCH sense to me.

imho if there is a god religion has ended up being the biggest sin against him/her - the biggest bloody blasphemy you can imagine.

right - that's my sunday sermon Wink feel free to batter me with your loving peaceful spiritual selves.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:44

lots of people on here, including myself, have actually lived in muslim countries. the whole 'ah you're just stupid daily mail reading idiots' business is not a mature enough or reasoned enough approach.

UptheChimney · 20/10/2013 13:45

that muslims lived quite tolerably with non muslims all around the middle east and beyond

I think my Jewish relatives might dispute that: Muslims were as bad as Christians in that respect, in their experience ...

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:51

yes, i think all of those who fled india to become the romany and the roma (mass refugee flight to get away from the moguls) might also disagree.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:53

i think i'm also coming to the point where whilst i'll always be on the side of friendly relations, inclusion, social cohesion, live and let live etc i find it hard to take anyone who believes that a being worthy of the name god would want people stoned to death for making a mistake, or being drawn to the wrong sex for example seriously and not think them massively spiritually and ethically deficient.

alemci · 20/10/2013 13:54

What I meant Swallowed was that GB was starting to move away from the church controlling how the individual thought since the reformation. The church doesn't make demands on British citizens and it is up to them if they want to follow Jesus.

Islam doesn't seem to be like that and the governments are influenced by the religion far more it appears.

Birds without Wings was a very good read about how everyone lived together in Asia Minor peacefully until 1914 or thereabouts and then it all went to pot.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 13:54

sounds more like devil worship - literally - worshipping a being you believe would see a young boy brutally killed for falling in love with another boy? or a woman who had an affair stoned to death in public? come on! does that sound like a god or the devil?

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 13:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 14:00

you might like the book 'religion for atheists' crescent - he says about chucking the baby out with the bathwater too. for different reasons and with a different standpoint on what is the baby and what is the bathwater than you i'm guessing. interesting though.