Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why I wear the niqab

669 replies

MumsnetGuestBlogs · 16/10/2013 10:58

The common impression that people have about women who wear the niqab is that they are forced to do so by their spouses or society, and are therefore oppressed. They are also believed to be uneducated, passive - kept behind closed doors, and not integrated within British society.

These negative prejudices are just that, though they are presented as facts - widely accepted, and promoted by cynical politicians every so often. Although I prefer not to be apologetic in my approach, I always find myself having to explain my choice to wear the niqab, in the hope that I can raise awareness, challenge misperceptions and help promote mutual respect.

To understand the niqab, it helps to understand the religion behind it. Islam has three simple messages – liberation from worshipping anything but the one God; following in the way of His Prophets including Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, peace be upon them; and servitude to the whole of humanity. Islam’s practical acts of liberation are many – from the duty of environmentalism (protecting ‘the Creation’ from the excesses of humankind) to the imperative of modesty for both women and men – one part of which is the face-veil.

In my view, the authentic reading of Scripture does not deem the niqab as compulsory, but rather as highly recommended: the wives of the prophet Muhammad used to wear it, and they are my role models.

Therefore the niqab is a religious symbol - and wearing it is considered by many Muslim women as an act of worship. Certainly the niqab is a spiritual journey that not many will take or understand, but those women who choose to wear it, such as myself, believe that it brings them closer to God, their Creator.

I also find the niqab liberating and dignifying; it gives me a sense of strength and empowers me. Deciding to wear it wasn’t easy - I had to go against my wishes of my parents, who discouraged me from wearing it because they feared I would face discrimination. But since I started wearing it, over 10 years ago, I have never changed my decision, nor have I ever found it a barrier. I continued my education to postgraduate level, and am now a professional molecular geneticist. Never once did I feel that the niqab prevented me from adding value to our British society – I’m involved in many community projects and events, and hold leadership positions in community organisations.

Some claim that women choose to wear the niqab do so due to social constraints and conditioning. This might be applicable to some extent in countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran, where individuals have to behave in a certain way for social approval (which can include wearing the face-veil). But in Britain, face-veiled women are minority within a minority – numbering perhaps just 0.001% of the total Muslim population in the UK (no statistics are available on this issue). Wearing the niqab is not so common within the British Muslim community that social conditioning could play any significant role: in Britain the majority of these women wear the niqab as a personal choice.

The norms of any society are the sum of its collective values, so rather than talking about the role of social conditioning in relation to face-veiled women, let’s talk about those norms. Public freedom is a cherished value in the UK, and is part of the fabric of our society. It allows individuals the right to practice and articulate their religious freedoms and rights – and offers a woman total freedom of choice to decide what she wears. Women who wear the niqab are simply articulating those religious and personal freedoms – and we cannot risk undermining them for the sake of social imaginaries, deep-seated psychological fears, or ignorance.

There are claims that the niqab is a 'security threat', but such claims are overblown. With regards to the issue of security, particularly the wearing of the niqab in court, let’s be clear that Muslim women are allowed to take off their veils, particularly in the pursuit of justice. But there’s no common approach and each case should be dealt with individually, in a manner that ensures the preservation of these women’s dignity and rights. These women are not committing any crime; they must be treated as human beings with full rights to participate equally in civil society, and to access education.

The reason, I believe, that the niqab debate has progressed this far is that there exists a wide range of far-right movements, politicians and intellectuals across the spectrum who seek to promote the hysteria that fuels anti-Muslim hatred. These people hope to make the face-veiled Muslim women emblematic of a sinister 'Other', a ‘problem’ impossible to solve or accept.

We have to overcome this authoritarian mentality which assumes a right to interfere in the lives, appearances and thoughts of other people. We all have so much to offer each other and we should extend our tolerance to respect, not merely for individuals, but for their beliefs as well. Otherwise, by all clamouring to enforce our own ideologies on the women we seek to “liberate”, we will be contributing to their collective oppression. Indeed, attempts to ban the niqab will marginalise face-veiled women from participating in public life.

It’s time to go beyond words, and to pursue peace, prosperity and freedom through social, political and interfaith harmony - seeking compassionate justice for everyone, and protecting freedom of the individual.

OP posts:
joanofarchitrave · 19/10/2013 20:46

Ihavea, why should a woman have to seem 'friendly' to everyone in order not to be actively threatening - can't she just be neutral? The requirement for women to smile all the time is one of the things I can imagine the niqab liberating a woman from tbh.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 07:27

you don't need to go to the hadiths to know forced marriage is disallowed as the koran clearly states it without need to look outside. the whole point of the koran being kept in it's original state and such cares being taken to keep it intact is due to allah, within it, stating it to be the full, total and final word of god. bizarre to then go against that and use other texts to 'interpret' it.

the example you give must have been in bad faith as i'm sure you're aware the koran makes very clear that forced marriage is not allowed and that you are to honour god above your parents meaning if your parents want you to do something against your religion, or obeying them would mean dishonouring god you have full permission to disobey them clearly stated in the koran and iirc it also compares itself to the early abrahamic religions there and makes clear the distinction that obedience to parents never comes above doing what is right.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 09:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

IHaveA · 20/10/2013 09:59

joanofarchitrave. I didn't say that women wearing Niqub should look friendly Hmm Confused and I have no idea where you get the idea from that there is a 'requirement for women to smile'. Certainly not from my post.

My posts were exploring reasons why so many people in the UK seem unsettled by women wearing the niqab. Is it because of people's views on oppression/extremism/'foreignness' or is it more simply because wearing something over the face is unfriendly looking or even a bit scary looking?

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 10:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 10:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 10:07

well obviously if she hasn't read the koran she might believe one verse taken outside the whole - i'm sure you'll agree therefore that it is very important that girls are educated. don't obey your parents over god is pretty clear - so is the koran's teaching against forced marriage - i repeat there is absolutely no need to go to the hadith to find this out unless you don't know the koran very well in which case we're back to cultural behaviour and social conditioning rather than religion again.

the koran is very clear on the unreliability of texts written by man and what it has led other religions to. it's pretty central. the koran is meant to be seen as the holy book - the rest are men's accounts of stuff. quite clearly one is the authority and the others must be taken with a great big dose of intelligence, historical and cultural awareness and critical analysis if you believe in the teachings of the koran.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 10:08

anyway i thought we were talking about how liberating and wonderful is islam is for women and yet we seem to have come round to you talking about forced marriage...

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 10:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

peacefuloptimist · 20/10/2013 10:24

you don't need to go to the hadiths to know forced marriage is disallowed as the koran clearly states it without need to look outside. the whole point of the koran being kept in it's original state and such cares being taken to keep it intact is due to allah, within it, stating it to be the full, total and final word of god. bizarre to then go against that and use other texts to 'interpret' it.

The Quran does not explicitly state that forcing your child to marry someone against their will is wrong. I have read the Quran back to front several times and I can not think of a single verse that even mentions forced marriages so I dont know which one you are referring to. The Quran is complete and has been preserved, however the Quran is general. It leaves the Prophet Muhammed PBUH to go in to specifics. For example prayer. We are told to pray in the Quran it even mentions briefly how we should prepare for prayer and when we should pray but the actions that muslim's perform when they prayer, the words we say etc are all derived from the sunnah of the Prophet Muhammed PBUH. His hadith is what actually teaches us the actions of how we must pray. Its the same with hajj. Muslims are told to go on the pilgrimage and some of the rites of the hajj are explained generally but it is in the hadith of the Prophet Muhammed PBUH that we get the fleshing out of all the detailed rites you need to do.

I think the only example I can give really of why you need the hadith to interpret is when you compare it to laws. The government passes laws but it is the judges who must interpret the law and actually set precedents on how that law is implemented. Therefore the actual wording of the law is general and its a judge who makes it specific. I hope that makes sense.

Gauri I was thinking about your question for quite a long while. To be honest its probably a question that is beyond my capability to answer comprehensively. I think if we knew the answer to that one we would be able to solve these problems. My personal opinion is it is a mixture of factors. Part of it is as Shalli said people of all religions sometimes struggle to live up to the teachings of their religion. Another reason is what Crescent hinted at which is that women are unaware of these hadiths. My MIL had a forced marriage and though she divorced her husband years ago when I mentioned to her the hadith about forced marriage she was shocked. She had never heard it before even though she is in her late 50s. I think it is very important for muslim women to become educated and learn about their religion because otherwise we are reliant on men to tell us what our rights are and we know that it is not in their interests to do that. Levels of literacy need to be improved so that women can not only read the Quran but also understand what they are reading. Its the combination of women not learning about their religion and men choosing not to tell them things that would lead to them challenging them. There is a growing movement now where women are seeking out religious education for themselves and organisations have been set up by prominent women scholars where they make religious learning accessible to the muslim female masses (e.g. Farhat Hashimi in Pakistan with her Al Huda organisation and number 7 on the list of 100 most powerful arab women Sheikha Munira Qubeysi who has a network of schools for women throughout the Middle East teaching about 75,000 students).

Its interesting as in the past Islamic female scholarship was very strong.
There is an Imam in the UK called Sheikh Akram Nadwi who wrote a 40 volume work on female scholars of hadith. In his book he writes about the lives of more than 8000 female muslim scholars dating from the 7th century to the present, from the earliest women scholars such as Prophet Muhammed's wife Aisha and the wife of one of his companions (for muslims when we say companion we mean something similar to disciple) Umm al Darda. The majority of the women mentioned taught men and they were consulted on a wide range of jurisprudence issues.

female scholars in Islam

This is a part of our history which I can honestly say is kept hidden from the vast majority of muslim women and it makes my blood boil. The good thing is we are reclaiming our history and I was pleased to see that in Palestine the first muslim woman Islamic court judge was appointed a few years ago. I have no idea of the number of female Islamic court judges globally but hopefully this number will grow as we need more female judges to get a much fairer representation of women.

peacefuloptimist · 20/10/2013 10:24

After watching the documentary on 'The Ottomans' on bbc iplayer (link below) I realised that one of our major problems is lack of a central authority.

www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03dwq95/The_Ottomans_Europes_Muslim_Emperors_Episode_2/

In Islam we dont have a central religious authoritative figure like the pope. This is a strength in some ways as it allows the religion to adapt to the different countries it has spread to rather then having one person dictate what is and what isnt Islam. This is what I mean when I say Islam is not monolithic. We have consensus on certain issues but there is room for a diversity of opinions. The problem with this though is who gets to tell people who interpret hadiths or the Quran incorrectly that they are wrong. They do not have to listen to any of the muslim scholars who have told them their actions go against Islam. In the past we had a central political authority in the person of the caliph and that role used to be filled by the ottoman sultan. Even if he had no real power in distant muslim lands he would still have a symbolic role that is he is recognised as some sort of figurehead. Whenever extremists would crop up in the past the caliph and his army would deal with them militarily because you cant expect ordinary citizens to deal with a group that is armed and prepared to use violence. It has to be dealt with by the state. When the ottoman empire fell it left a power vacuum. All the muslim governments will police their own borders but who is going to take responsibility for a country like Somalia or Afghanistan where there is no stability? This is a major problem that Muslim countries need to work on but most muslim leaders are too corrupt and are more concerned with holding on to power in their own country and are unwilling to do anything to solve any of the problems muslims face. In some countries you might not even ever hear the Imam in the mosque mention those hadiths about injustice because the governments do not want people to challenge their corrupt oppressive regimes. Anyway this is just my own opinion but I don't really know the answer.

CoteDAzur · 20/10/2013 10:26

Coming back to the niqab - Both Quran and Hadith agree that Muslim women are not supposed to wear the veil. So why does OP think it is "not compulsory but highly recommended" in Islam?

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 10:40

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

CoteDAzur · 20/10/2013 11:13

.

CoteDAzur · 20/10/2013 11:16

Mohammad's Hadith saying a woman should cover everything except hands and feet sounds pretty much like 'shouldn't cover face' to me.

So there is nothing in the Quran that says the face needs to be covered. And there is Hadith saying "cover whatever except face", so why does OP think the veil is "highly recommended" in Islam?

It really makes no sense.

nicename · 20/10/2013 11:30

I met a convert who insisted hands and feet were to be covered, but not her face.

CoteDAzur · 20/10/2013 11:35

.

CoteDAzur · 20/10/2013 11:36

Gah. That was a mistake on my part, obviously.

Mohammad's Hadith says a woman should cover everything except hands and face. And that sounds pretty much like 'shouldn't cover face' to me.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 11:45

iii. a. In Surah Nisa Chapter 4, Verse 19 (4: 19)

“Oh! You who believe, you are forbidden to inherit women against their will!”

b. Islamic law requires the consent of both the parties before marriage. In matters related to marriage a woman cannot be forced by anyone including her father.

nicename · 20/10/2013 12:13

But in some cultures a family will force consent (emotional blackmail and threats).

Isn't it sad that this has been frowned upon - in writing, direct edicts from God - for centuries, yet it still goes on.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 20/10/2013 12:22

You're right nicename. But with this, and the issues of terrorism and extremism, it is important to make the distinction between the faith and its holy writings and tenets, and the things that people do in the name of that faith.

Some people are stupid, cruel, bigoted and full of hate - that is not the fault of their religion or faith. But the religions and faiths do have a responsibility to ensure that they preach the right way, so that the cruel/extremists/bigots are pointed up as being what they are - and the religion has condemned their beliefs and actions (but not them, as I believe we should hate the sin but love the sinner - so that there is the chance for change and rehabilitation.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 12:24

they do indeed have that responsibility and to speak out and defend their faith from such actions and to do so loudly.

UptheChimney · 20/10/2013 12:33

It really makes no sense

Religious belief rarely does ...

crescentmoon · 20/10/2013 12:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2013 12:38

yes the respective church's did have to speak out and work in the peace process and they did.