Oxocube, I wasn't labelling struggling children as the lowest common denominator. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear.
I was talking about those children (and their parents) who aren't that motivated (they may be bright, they often aren't, IME) and like to pull down their classmates by sneering at them for wanting to learn things.
I'm not talking about children like your DD who sounds delightful! I struggled with maths (it's like pages and pages of squiggles with random rules as far as I'm concerned - I could DO English, arts and humanities, but maths and some science - the more maths-heavy stuff was just beyond me totally, partly because I had some abysmal teachers, I'm sure - I remember "getting" maths when I was 11 and had a brilliant teacher who I actually understood - then it all went downhill!)
I'm sorry I wasn't clear - I hope that has clarified what I meant - a bit!
By hunkermunker on Sat 26-May-07 23:27:37
I think it's an interesting thing to explore.
Why is it so awful to talk about children being bright?
Is it Just Not British?
I think it's pandering to the lowest common denominator, who are often the loudest-mouthed sneeriest ones and can't understand why anyone would want to "do all that borin' readin' sh1t".