Gosh, just seen the crayon comment. So Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and Holbein can no longer be counted as gifted, then.
Suppose they may still be considered bright though. Always something.
This does seem to me a rather sad and not uncommon attitude: that a gifted child must somehow live up to their giftedness by having no connection with anything that supposedly belongs to a previous stage of development. So instead of encouraging the child to get the most out of anything they come across, anxious parents insist that "little X is too gifted to use crayons/play the tambourine/read Winnie the Pooh"- thus sabotaging X's chances to get the most out of crayons, develop his sense of rhythm, or find new levels of understanding Winnie the Pooh.
If I have any advice at all for a parent of a gifted child, it would be to encourage them to get the most out of absolutely anything they come across. Tell them that real grown-up artists use crayons to make drawings that stay famous for hundreds and hundreds of years, tell them that real grown-up musicians learn about music by playing tambourines, tell them that real grown-up scholars read Winnie the Pooh and find new, interesting things in there. With the right attitude, watching a boiling kettle is not a tragic waste of a gifted mind, but a chance to invent the steam engine.
With an anxious attitude, with a mind that never engages with anything until it has ascertained that the subject is suitable for the gifted, gifts are wasted and life is, quite frankly, less fun.