I don't know if it's really worth me coming back to this, but I'd like to challenge the narrative that seems to be I was trying to 'shut down' conversation about bad practice and negate people's experiences. I really wasn't.
Do I think GP (or the NHS at large) is functioning well at the moment? No,
I don't. How could I, when I spend my days at work painfully aware of how little we have to offer huge numbers of people. Do I think women have historically been treated badly by the medical profession - yes I do. And as a female GP I hold that with me all the time.
I genuinely do think it's important to tell individual doctors when they've got things wrong, and have answered and supported other GPs in answering complaints (formal and informal) on that basis. As a GP appraiser I review complaints with those doctors and we discuss what the crux of the issue may have been and what learning points there are from any negative incident. These things are done routinely, whatever you may think. I certainly am not arrogant or on a pedestal or in any other way thinking that I'm beyond reproach.
I think it's worth pointing out (although I'll probably be shouted down) that a lot of things are more obvious in hindsight. Many diseases present with vague and developing symptoms, so that it takes time to work out what's going on. Not everyone with bloody diarrhoea has Crohn's disease. Not everyone with a slightly numb arm has MS. As GPs we see huge numbers of patients with vague and non-specific symptoms, and weeding out the serious from the not-so is difficult.
However, doing that in an appropriate way is hugely dependent on a good relationship with the patient. The tales on here of being dismissed or belittled or ignored are awful and it saddens me to hear them. Communication is often a good GPs greatest skill (along with some medical knowledge of course) and it's important that we work on that. I teach medical students as well and I promise we do spend a lot of time talking about communication skills and active listening.
As regards ordering tests and things, we are often limited in what we have access to (sometimes in ridiculous ways). There are local and National guidelines as to what GPs can do, sometimes based on cost alone, sometimes based on who-knows-what. An example - I can no longer send someone directly for an x-ray from the surgery as I used to. I have to refer them, which then takes weeks. So actually acute injuries we do now signpost to A+E or the Urgent Treatment Centre, both of which have access to a simple test that we know the patient needs but cannot request.
When I first commented on this thread I guess I was triggered by the 'ridiculous' in the title. I felt that it was a thread to laugh at doctors who are generally doing their best in often difficult circumstances. I was freshly sad about the doctor whose appraisal documentation talked about leaving the NHS and moving abroad. I'm ground down by the daily dissatisfaction (not all unwarranted) and abuse I and my colleagues face at work. It's demoralising, and conversations like this do add to that. And GPs are leaving. They're retiring, they're choosing different specialties, they're moving abroad. That's not a threat, it's a fact. Someone up-thread mentioned that the system is built in the wrong way and I don't necessarily disagree. But this is the system we have and it's predicated on GPs as 'gatekeepers' and soon there won't be enough of us to do that job and things will collapse even more than they are doing already. The joy I get from my job at the moment is firmly based on what I can do for the individual in front of me, because I really can't control much else.
This is far too long! TLDR: I don't want to shut down debate but I think ridiculing people achieves nothing.