I part vaccinated. Various reasons.
OP please do some of your own research. Pointless asking her on MN because the pro vaccination people are, sadly, in the main, pretty vocal and somewhat nasty at times. There actually is proof that vaccines are not 100% safe. There is a vaccine damage fund which has paid out substantial amounts of money. Vaccines do not give life long immunity - wonder how many of these Mumsnetters vigorously shaking their head at you are actually walking around unvaccinated themselves? ( You do all know that they wear off after time?)
I'm not anti vaccination. I'm pro choice. My son was hospitalised for chickenpox, a supposedly 'mild' childhood disease (as we used to refer to measles) He was also hospitalised for whooping cough - something he was vaccinated against - so that proves that vaccines are not 100% effective.
We have still yet to really see the full implications of such a comprehensive vaccination programme as the first round of 'kids' injected with MMR are now having babies themselves.
My overall advice would be - if you do decide to vaccinate, spread them out. Do not take your baby when she is even vaguely poorly. You do not have to have all of the shots done at the same time despite what the red book will tell you. I specifically asked to have one at a time done, and the nurse actually commented how sensible that was. That way, it reduces the likelihood of adverse reaction, and if something was to happen, doctors would know what was causing things.
I remember reading this when I was deciding - yes, i know the 'source' is obviously from a more 'anti' site and US based but the facts are true (cross checked)
You take a risk whichever way you chose. However, it does seem somewhat odd that the chances of being ill from a reaction to the vaccine is greater than you chances of simply having measles.
therefusers.com/6-times-more-measles-vaccine-adverse-reaction-reports-than-measles-cases-in-2011/