loon he told me that the MRI definitely showed no prolapse and 'I have checked with radiographer' to recheck it or something. Which in itself makes me think he has not looked at it but just glanced at the report. I didn't really understand what he meant by that, but didn't get that I didn't understand until after when I was like 'what did he mean by checking with radiographer?' I think he spun me a line to get me out of there tbh.
So, no I didn't see the MRI results, not the scan or the report. He had the x-ray results on the screen only which showed the slightly movement of the vertebrae, but that x-ray was from June 2013 and I had no idea what was being shown. He wasn't actually showing me, it was just there and i looked at it. I mean, honestly, it might not even have been mine!
But, he was insistent that 'the prolapse that was there before is no longer there'. He didn't want to enter into any discussion about the state of the disc further than that statement about conversation with radiographer. Maybe losty can shed some light - my understanding losty from pain clinic guy was that neuro don't always rely on the radiographer report, but will look at the scan themselves and read the report in conjunction with the scan (he also said most neuro just the report in the bin and check the scan themselves). Would they then come back to a radiographer for a discussion of the MRI?
I am going to see my GP tomorrow. I know he has the report, but not the scan itself.
I am going to be asking for my notes from hospital tomorrow, formally. I will be specific about getting my scan pictures in that.
I know for certain that it's something with the spine/disc/vertebrae as the pain is deep within, with out without the nerve pain, the other pain is so deep inside and very local as the point all the pain emanates from. Although the symptoms feel different to the trapped nerve that I had surgery for - that was very much a feeling that my whole leg might fall off due to the pain and numbness within the entire leg at one point. I am still getting the other symptoms that bother me, but I think I agree with the GP that it is all linked somehow to my back.
Regardless of the surgeon's view, I know this is not 'non-specific' as I have spent 2.5 years closely analysing my pain and I know it (but not this new numbness, not yet, I will know it soon!) And it's not muscle pain.
So yes, I think it's the disc. A disc (maybe it's even a different one, who knows).