Evening. Blimey, wish I'd been on MN three years ago and found this tyoe of thread. Hope no-one minds if I share my story.
Traumatic birth, ventouse delivery. 4th degree tear, doctor who delivered baby wasn't confident enough to do the repair so called out the head consultant who, at 3am in the morning, made it very clear he was unhappy about being called in for surgery.
Few days later at home I am in pain. Midwives first check reported "wound healing nicely". I'm none the wiser (first baby) and think the pain I am experiencing is normal. Second MW visit, I was in the depths of baby blues, hadn't showered, felt grubby, said I didn't want to be examined. In hindsight, had i knew what was coming I would have BUT also feel the MW should have stressed the importance but anyway...
Next MW contact was by phone as a "do you need a visit? (It was bank holiday weekend), again as I'm a bit of a "don't want to cause a fuss" person I mumble a "errr no I suppose not?"
Couple of days later MW visit at home, examination, after which she sends me straight to hospital as all the stitches had broken down and the wound was severly infected. A doctoe examines me and says in a disbelieveing voice "Who DID this repair??". When I mention head consultants (HC) name he immediately clams up, gives me some antibiotics and tells me I have to speak to HC next week.
Next week- see HC. He examines me, takes off gloves. Says, in the same manner as previous doctor "Who did this repair?". When I say it was him he puts a freash pair of gloves on and re-examines pulling some stitches out as well. More antibiotics. See him again in two weeks.
Visit to GP, examines repair says "This will need re-doing.
Visit to HC- he agrees to do re-repair.
Re-repair. Under local anaesthetic. The pain afterwards is IMMENSE. I couldn;t sit down for two weeks :(
Re-repair still no good. Return to HC. My nethers look like a car crash and I am extremely distraught. This is now 3 months after giving birth. HC agrees to do another repair under general anaesthetic.
After this op I buried my head in the sand for about 9 months. No sexual realtions since birth. Faecal incontinence. I tried to ignore. Why oh why I agreed to him doing all the repairs I really don't know. After about a year (still no sexual relations) I went to GP and explained all. Said I wanted to be referred to a different consultant. Saw new consultant and agreed to try gels, excersises, dilators. Inside of vagina is incredibly sore, as if there is an open cut but consultant reports he can't see anything. It's agreed that a 4th op will take place to remove excess scar tissue.
4th op a sucess. As in the pain is gone, sexual relations possible. Not great but as good as it's ever going to be.
I decided to take legal action and after a LOT of to-ing and fro-ing an independent medical bod decides that HC was not negligent as such. he pointed out that whilst his choice of thread used in the stitching was unusual, it wasn't negligent and couldn;t be attributed to the breakdown of the stitches and subsequent infection. Having read my medical notes during this process it was evident that some documents were "re-written" insinuating that the wound was healing very well and it was just "me" that felt this discomfort. If that was the case then why was further surgery agreed etc? And scar tissue removed?? The medical bod DID say it may be possible to prove the MW's as being negligent but by that time I had had enough and dropped the whole thing.
Three years on, it still looks a mess, I can't wear tampons and still have the ocassional faecal accident. BUT otherwise I am healthy, my son is healthy etc.
Thanks for reading.