I absolutely do not believe that gender critical feminists want to see harm come to trans people. Although there are some positions that I don't agree with, I am angered by the constant comparisons made between groups who actively want to harm trans people and feminists who simply do not agree with transgender ideology to some extent. Wanting to protect single sex spaces, women and girls in sports, or female healthcare is in no way comparable to the actions of those who assault, rape or murder trans people. In my experience, the people making these comparisons are are typically those who are unlikely to ever face such an experience, and use those of us who have suffered violence and abuse as pawns with which to manipulate debate to their favour. I can see that your intention was to reassure me and I appreciate the openness, self reflection, and decency you showed in response to @SqueakyDinosaur.
My mother was heart broken about what felt to her like the death of the girl I once was, and the life I could have had. It is very hard for me to know I caused that pain to her when deciding to transition. However, time has been a great healer for us both, and we have a very strong relationship today. As she has gotten older, her health has declined significantly, and it is a privilege to be able to help and support her as she once did for me.
I appreciate that some people believe that medical/surgical transition is never the correct option. I respect the right of others to hold that view, my concern only comes when people attempt to restrict the choices of others. By that, I do not mean putting safeguards in place to protect vulnerable people. I mean aiming to prevent transition at all costs, even where attempts to find a better solution have failed. In truth, most people's positions lie within a grey area between unquestioning affirmation and denial in all circumstances, which is harder to codify, and must be considered on an individual basis.
As to my opinion on the new NHS guidance. I must be honest that I hadn't considered the issue of side room availability until it was raised. It is absolutely true that side rooms are often at a premium in hospital settings, and are essential to ensuring infection control and the protection of immunosuppressed people. People identifying as trans is sufficiently common now that I can see how the low supply of these rooms could pose an issue.
My instinctive response would be to reserve the use of side rooms for people who are no longer read as their biological sex, in those scenarios where demand outstrips supply. I am aware that that would benefit me to the exclusion of other trans people, and so it may seem like an unfair and self centred response. However, speaking personally, the discomfort I feel existing in female spaces relates to the stares and hostility it results in. The changes that I have made to my body have provided me great relief, but cannot be separated from the fact that they result in me being read as male. I actually miss many female spaces, particularly with women who were gender-non-conforming and/or lesbian. I know this is probably hard to understand, as someone who has asserted a desire to be male, but my distress has always related to my anatomy rather than being read as female in and of itself.
As such, accessing female spaces was not problematic for me until I was read as male. When I first transitioned I avoided using the female toilets at my sixth form college (and was provided an alternative provision). This was for two main reasons - I worried that I might make girls feel uncomfortable, and I also worried that it would lead to people interrogating the decision I had made. However, when out in public around people who did not know about my decision, and having yet to make any physical changes to my body, I would use the women's toilet. Whilst I have always been quite masculine, and it was not rare for me to be mistaken for a boy, I would still be read as a butch girl/woman when using the female toilets and never had any issues before the use of hormones. (Single occupancy gender neutral toilets didn't really exist by and large when I was a teenager and so that was not an option at that time.)
I still think the use of a side room is the best option for all trans people where it is possible. I appreciate why that might be seen as a privilege, and generally I feel like we do not make enough efforts to protect people's privacy in hospital (even in single sex spaces), which leads to understandable resentment. I would say though that the state of hospital accommodation is not the fault of trans people, and I think it is fairer to hold the government accountable for it. It serves their interest for us to try and drag everyone down to the same level rather than advocate for improvements for all patients.
I have been placed on single sex wards, both male and female, since transition. Both were very uncomfortable experiences for me. I was placed on a male ward before and after a cystoscopy. It was populated by mostly elderly men, and it wasn't that I felt threatened by a specific individual. However, I generally feel vulnerable and on edge in male single sex spaces. I don't know whether that is excessive paranoia now that I am consistently read as male, but regardless it induces extreme and unwavering anxiety. Explanations and consent taking by the care team could be heard by all as there was only a curtain pulled and it was a quiet ward. Due to the differences in male vs female cystoscopy, those discussions made my biological sex clear. I didn't feel comfortable to remain but also didn't have the confidence to ask to be moved, as I already had a lot of anxiety regarding the procedure. Instead, I requested that they keep the curtain pulled around my bed. I do recognise that beyond my own feelings of discomfort, it was unfair to the men on that ward who were also undergoing an invasive intimate procedure and at the very least deserved the privacy and dignity afforded by being on a ward with other men.
In terms of female wards, I had to spend a lot of time on them due to the multiple surgeries required to correct the injury, and had a particularly long stay after the infection I suffered following the first surgery. It was very uncomfortable as I was stared at a lot by other patients and their families, and I was already in a very bad place mentally and physically. The nursing and medical teams were very kind and they did make efforts to maintain my dignity, but again there is always an issue with everything being heard by all the patients around. That did alleviate most of the staring from other patients, and there as an older woman next to me who clearly made a special effort to smile and be welcoming to me, which I thought was very kind. However, it felt very exposing to have details regarding the injuries, the assault, and that I was trans widely disseminated, even if it was not intentional.
As I have said above, I don't think these failures to protect patient privacy are unique to me, or to trans people. However, I do think there are specific challenges faced by trans people placed on single sex wards when they are read as the opposite sex. I also want to be clear that I am not attempting to attack the justifiable concern felt by women undergoing gynaecological care and faced with exposure to a person that appeared biologically male. However, I can't deny that the experience was very difficult for me on a personal level.