Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: chat
MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 15/04/2024 16:12

If you read the details, the issue was that one of the parties in a specific case was a member of the Garrick, so the judge might not have been impartial.

RawBloomers · 15/04/2024 19:36

It’s unclear if the judge would have known the other party in the case was a regular visitor, but once it was brought to light it seems pretty shocking that he didn’t recuse himself.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page