Woman arrested for attempting to get access a horse for sexual act purposes

[OhHolyJesus]

“Arizona Woman Arrested For Using Craiglist To Find A Horse To Have Sex With”

And to be more specific so to save of link clicks:

Waelde’s post in the Missed Connections section, which was published on April 8, stated: “I am 22 years old and I want to play with a male Horse. simple as that. If you have access to a Male horse, and can allow me access to a male horse, then contact me please 😉 I will do something in return.”

www.bolde.com/arizona-woman-craigslist-horse-sex/

All I will say is at 22 you have to wonder what this person has been exposed to in their young life to be interested in such an undertaking.

[Helleofabore]

Oh, and SisterMonica is this something you found out after you saw a newspaper article about an ongoing trial, or something you found out socially?

I presume you reported her to the police, if it was the latter?

I most certainly hope so too.

Did you SisterMonica?

[YetAnotherSpartacus]

Everytime I read 'afab' I think of

[BatmansBat]

OMG, I just assumed SisterMonica reported it to the police. The thought of it not reported is beyond horrific.

[SteppedOnBloodyLego]

Women: this article refers to a biological male as a woman and reports that a woman committed this crime. That seems a bit off.

TRAs: transphobic bigots!!

Normal.

This!

[Ninkanink]

This seems like a good time to remind posters of the petitions/activism topic - If you haven’t had a look in a while there is a current petition link directly related to this issue that needs signatures and/or sharing.

[BlueLobelia]

@RedDogsBeg

The problem with this thread is the number of you who are willing to jump straight to the conclusion that it's a trans female - in this case it is

No, we jumped straight to the conclusion it was a MAN, which it was as in at least 95% of cases of sexual abuse it is a MAN who is the perpetrator as evidence proves over and over and over again, therefore it is not an illogical or unsupportable conclusion to reach.

ALL crimes whatever they may be should accurately record the SEX of the perpetrator, their 'gender' is irrelevant.

this

very tired of penis havers trying to make out that their feeeeeelings matter more than- well- everyone else really.

[SteppedOnBloodyLego]

SisterMonicaJoansHabit

Plenty of afab women who are not trans who commit acts of pedophilia, bestiality, and paraphilia.

Really? Can you please link to some stats supporting this?

Oh yeah, did you mean to say you friend was “sexually abusing her dog” and not “had sex with her dog” - there’s no such thing as “sex with animals”, sex implies consent. Ffs

[FemaleAndLearning]

@EmpressWitchDoesntBurn

Was it anyone else’s first question when they saw the thread title? Even before reading the OP?

Absolutely, knew this would not be a woman. I guess it's clickbait.

[Ninkanink]

‘Plenty’?

I would like you to quantify that assertion please.

Oh wait. For that you’d need to have accurate data with which to carry out your analysis.

[Helleofabore]

I guess it's clickbait.

Yes and those who think that it is wrong to 'misgender' this person, how much harm does it do to women to have a headline such as this?

Or are you so deep in the belief that 'women do it too' that you think that posting false narratives about female sex habits is not harmful at all?

Are you so wedded to 'women abuse too' (and yes, they do, but rarely and statistics prove this) that you will focus on misgendering rather than the perpetuation that females are simply sex objects to some males and that a 'woman' sexually abusing a horse is entertainment?

[MarshmallowSwede]

As soon as I read it I know it was not an adult human female who did this. Funny how whenever they try to pin their crimes on women, we by the very nature of the crime still can tell it’s a man.

Men’s behaviours are very telling no matter if they have a dress on or not.

[BlueLobelia]

@MarshmallowSwede

As soon as I read it I know it was not an adult human female who did this. Funny how whenever they try to pin their crimes on women, we by the very nature of the crime still can tell it’s a man.

Men’s behaviours are very telling no matter if they have a dress on or not.

this this and this

Fuck me I am tired of these people and their apologists.

[FemaleAndLearning]

[quote Orf1abc]Assuming a female sex offender is trans is transphobic and ignorant. Transphobic because you're negatively stereotyping, and ignorant because you're wilfully ignoring that some women commit vile crimes.

Here you go, apologies that it doesn't fit your nasty stereotyping.

www.derbyshiretimes.co.uk/news/crime/derbyshire-woman-appears-before-magistrates-facing-20-sex-with-dog-charges-3310369[/quote]
That is a really bad example. I don't think a woman can commit buggery or have penetrative sex with an animal. If a woman used a dildo wouldn't it be called something else?Please do correct me if I'm wrong. Beastality is not an area of expertise for me.
These acts of abuse should be recorded correctly.

[KimikosNightmare]

I don't particularly want to go down the nightmare rabbithole which would probably be required to answer your question with any authority but it seems that buggery in relation to bestiality can mean penetration of or by the animal- so yes it could be committed by a woman.

I would add that as with " sex with children" "child prostitute" and the like can the term "sex with an animal" be avoided?

None of these are "sex with....". They are despicable, depraved and vile acts of sexual abuse where consent is impossible.

[CorianderBee]

@Workinghardeveryday

Wasn’t there an English queen who regularly did this?!

That was a myth spread to smear Queen Catherine's reputation

[ShadowInVain]

I would add that as with " sex with children" "child prostitute" and the like can the term "sex with an animal" be avoided?

Quite - I think 'animal cruelty' or 'animal abuse' would be the only way to describe this.

[TalkingOutYerArse]

Knew this would be a man also. Funny that.

[Jackgrealishscurtains]

[quote YetAnotherSpartacus]Everytime I read 'afab' I think of

[/quote]
Yes, same here!

[RadandMad]

@EmpressWitchDoesntBurn

Was it anyone else’s first question when they saw the thread title? Even before reading the OP?

Yup. Me.

[FemaleAndLearning]

@KimikosNightmare

I don't particularly want to go down the nightmare rabbithole which would probably be required to answer your question with any authority but it seems that buggery in relation to bestiality can mean penetration of or by the animal- so yes it could be committed by a woman.

I would add that as with " sex with children" "child prostitute" and the like can the term "sex with an animal" be avoided?

None of these are "sex with....". They are despicable, depraved and vile acts of sexual abuse where consent is impossible.

I totally agree with you. I actually didn't know how to compose the sentence to make sense with the headline without using 'sex with', sorry it was badly phrased. It is abuse.

[PurgatoryOfPotholes]

Tbf, FemaleAndLearning, you used the term abuse in the same post. We'd had two people before you refer to it as "sex with [species]", in the context of telling us to be nicer to Waelde!

[FemaleAndLearning]

Thanks Purgatory, 8 feel less misunderstood now.

[SourAppleChew]

@PurgatoryOfPotholes

I believe it was a malicious lie about Catherine the Great, intended to shame her for her number of human lovers.

I'm not convinced it's anatomically possible for a woman to do that with a male horse without injury.

Yes, it has been disproven.

[thinkingaboutLangCleg]

When male crimes are being recorded as being committed by females, it is our business.

Exactly. Women are getting blamed for crimes committed by men. It is skewing crime statistics, as well as putting women prisoners at risk from male sex offenders being put in women’s prisons.

[Naunet]

@SisterMonicaJoansHabit

Plenty of afab women who are not trans who commit acts of pedophilia, bestiality, and paraphilia.

What's shocking about this article is not the gender of the person, but the intended act.

The problem with this thread is the number of you who are willing to jump straight to the conclusion that it's a trans female - in this case it is. But I once had the displeasure to know a female, born female, who had sex with her dog.

Again, it wasn't her sex or gender that bothered me, it was the act.

You’re aware that 99% of sex crimes are committed by males, correct? So when we hear of sexual abuse or rape, it’s perfectly rational to assume the person involved will be male.

It must be so frustrating that you cant control people’s thoughts though, huh?! 🤨